Despite the potential of qualitative case research (QCR) to embrace novel research questions
and practices, it is frequently reduced to a single methodological template, namely that of
qualitative positivism. The authors review and analyze case study practices in family business
(FB), drawing insights from 88 articles published across various academic outlets. Their results
indicate the impact of the positivistic template as the most commonly used one with 75 articles,
but interestingly, identify alternatives captured by interpretivist and critical realist perspectives.
They conclude with a discussion by problematizing the use of templates in FB case research. The
authors contribute in four ways. First, they discuss, deconstruct and codify case study practices
drawing on exemplars from FB literature. Second, they discuss common practices among the
scholars of the qualitative positivist template and explain its potential for FB scholarship. Third,
they discuss and outline the potential of alternative case study perspectives of interpretivism and
critical realism. Fourth, they discuss the potential of multiple methods and the epistemological
alternatives for enriching all the case study practices currently used.