A1 Journal article – refereed

Counteracting deceptive responding in the Finnish Investigative Instrument of Child Sexual Abuse (FICSA)




List of Authors: Alessandro Tadei, Juulia Haajanen, Johan Pensar, Pekka Santtila, Jan Antfolk

Publisher: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD

Publication year: 2020

Journal: Journal of Sexual Aggression

Journal name in source: JOURNAL OF SEXUAL AGGRESSION

Journal acronym: J SEX AGGRESS

Number of pages: 12

ISSN: 1355-2600

eISSN: 1742-6545

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13552600.2020.1846802


Abstract
Unfounded child sexual abuse (CSA) allegations take investigative resources from real cases and have detrimental consequences for the people involved. The Finnish Investigative Instrument of Child Sexual Abuse (FICSA) supports investigators by estimating the probability of a CSA allegation being true based on the child's background information. In the current study, we aimed at making FICSA resistant to deception. Two gender-specific questionnaires with FICSA questions and additional "trap" questions were constructed. The trap questions were designed to seem statistically related to CSA although they were not. Combining the answers of 278 real victims and 275 16-year-old students, instructed to simulate being CSA victims, we built a Naive Bayes classifier that successfully separated the two groups (AUC = 0.91 for boys and 0.92 for girls). By identifying false allegations early in the investigation, authorities' resources can be directed towards allegations that are more likely true, effectively helping actual CSA victims.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2021-24-06 at 10:51