This article addresses the relationships between emotions and the law,
and how they define public order and constitute emotional legal
landscapes. Using the example of the litigation process of the
censorship of Dries Verhoeven’s art installation Ceci n’est pas... we
explore the power of individual and collective emotions in acting as a
stimulus to the evaluation of the acceptability and legality of artworks
in urban public spaces. Verhoeven’s installation was interrupted in
Helsinki, Finland, because of public obscenity after a passer-by who was
offended by the artwork reported it to the police. This led to a three-
year court process, the legal archaeological analysis of which reveals the
complex moral geographies in the formation of legal landscapes: the
arbitrariness of the interpretation of the law, the significance of time
and place in legal evaluation, and the hidden morals included in the
understanding of public order. The results show the potential of the
concept of emotional legal landscapes in exploring the spatial effects of
legal processes, and in revealing how legal reasoning is complex and
emotionally laden instead of being carried out by rational legal actors.