A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Structural Validity and Internal Consistency of the Professional Nurse Self‐Assessment A‐Scale (II) for Measuring Clinical Competence Among Graduating Nordic Nursing Students




TekijätEronen, Lotta; Strandell-Laine, Camilla; Wangensteen, Sigrid; Rauhala, Auvo; Fagerström, Lisbeth

ToimittajaDonnelly Frank

KustantajaWiley

Julkaisuvuosi2025

Lehti:Nursing Research and Practice

Artikkelin numero8312620

ISSN2090-1429

eISSN2090-1437

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/8312620

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1155/nrp/8312620

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/504690966


Tiivistelmä
Aim

To test the structural validity and internal consistency of one (A-scale) of the two Professional Nurse Self-Assessment Scale II (ProffNurse SAS II) scales among graduating Nordic nursing students with the goal of assessing their psychometric properties when used separately.

Design

This study employed an explorative factor analyses to validate the ProffNurse SAS II A-scale items (n = 50) (self-assessed clinical competence).

Methods

The data were analyzed using jamovi Version 2.3.21. The suitability of the data for the planned analyses was assessed using established criteria for good model fit prior to conducting statistical tests. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to examine the underlying structure of one of the two scales, given its application in a new population and the lack of prior confirmation of its factor structure within this specific context. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha.

Data Sources

Convenience sampling was used to select the participants among graduating nursing students in five Nordic countries. Data collection was made digitally during 2021–2022. A total of 274 graduating nursing students from five Nordic countries and 12 different universities completed the ProffNurse SAS II A-scale holding 50 items in local languages.

Results

EFA and parallel analysis elicited a five-factor solution accounting for 52.14% of variance in scores. Internal consistency reliability was supported with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.960 for the ProffNurse SAS II A-scale. The five factors were named Direct Clinical Practice (1), Ethical and Collaborative Practice (2); Pharmaceutical Practice (3); Digital Coaching and Guidance (4); and Development and Leadership (5). The A-scale with a reduced number of items (from 50 to 44 items) showed proper structural validity and internal consistency for measuring self-assessed clinical competence and needs for further training among graduating nursing students.

Conclusions

The scale supports the study’s theoretical framework and competencies of the graduating nursing students.

Implications for the Profession and/or Patient Care

Self-assessment supports evidence-based practice and nursing education, and the ProffNurse SAS II A-scale offers a valid tool for measuring clinical competence among graduating students.

Reporting Method

The STROBE checklist for cross-sectional studies was adhered to, as well as the COSMIN reporting guideline.

Patient or Public Contribution

Graduating nursing students from five Nordic countries contributed to the study by answering the questionnaire.


Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This study did not receive any public funding.


Last updated on 2025-31-10 at 15:44