A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
The roles of the state in the financialisation of housing in Turkey
Tekijät: Celik, Ozlem
Kustantaja: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2023
Lehti: Housing Studies
Vuosikerta: 38
Numero: 6
Aloitussivu: 1006
Lopetussivu: 1026
ISSN: 0267-3037
eISSN: 1466-1810
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2021.1928003
Tiivistelmä
What is the relationship between the state and housing financialisation? Much of the literature describes the state playing a role to promote the regulatory, legislative, and financial conditions needed to allow global financial capital to penetrate land and property markets. I build on these arguments to develop in what ways the state is playing an active role in housing financialisation in Turkey. I suggest that the Turkish national state has deliberately, actively, and forcefully pursued housing financialisation by (i) introducing new legislation; (ii) creating financial frameworks to encourage speculation by domestic and international capital on land and housing as assets (iii) enclosing public land and exploiting informal types of tenure; (iv) assetising land and housing by developing revenue-sharing urban regeneration projects; and (v) using coercive legal and penal force to criminalise informal development, and to quell resistance to state-led regeneration. My conclusions add weight to Christophers' contention that the role of the state needs to be reconceptualised to capture its direct involvement in housing financialisation.
What is the relationship between the state and housing financialisation? Much of the literature describes the state playing a role to promote the regulatory, legislative, and financial conditions needed to allow global financial capital to penetrate land and property markets. I build on these arguments to develop in what ways the state is playing an active role in housing financialisation in Turkey. I suggest that the Turkish national state has deliberately, actively, and forcefully pursued housing financialisation by (i) introducing new legislation; (ii) creating financial frameworks to encourage speculation by domestic and international capital on land and housing as assets (iii) enclosing public land and exploiting informal types of tenure; (iv) assetising land and housing by developing revenue-sharing urban regeneration projects; and (v) using coercive legal and penal force to criminalise informal development, and to quell resistance to state-led regeneration. My conclusions add weight to Christophers' contention that the role of the state needs to be reconceptualised to capture its direct involvement in housing financialisation.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali