A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
The climate impacts of healthcare digitalization: A scoping review
Tekijät: Nissinen, Ari; Pitkänen, Atte; Barchuk, Anton; Hosseinian, Aida; Johansson, Annika; Kaisti, Matti; Karvonen, Jaakko; Marttinen, Pekka; Moen, Hans; Peltola, Emilia; Sokka, Laura; Tikkinen, Kari A. O.
Kustantaja: SAGE
Julkaisuvuosi: 2025
Journal: Digital health
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Digital health
Lehden akronyymi: Digit Health
Vuosikerta: 11
eISSN: 2055-2076
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251364666
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251364666
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/499834605
OBJECTIVE The rapid digitalization of healthcare has implications for its carbon footprint. The goal of this scoping review was to identify how digitalization is proceeding in healthcare and the mechanisms through which it can affect the climate impacts of healthcare.
METHODS The scoping review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and utilized the databases Web of Science and PubMed to identify literature on the climate impacts of digitalization in healthcare. The literature search identified 32 relevant studies. In addition, diagnostics, overdiagnosis, self-tracking technologies, and artificial intelligence (AI) were identified as key topics not sufficiently represented in the literature review, and related articles were added into the material.
RESULTS Most carbon footprint analyses focused on telemedicine solutions, but research topics also included health informatics, education, diagnoses, overdiagnosis, treatments, medical appliances, robotics, and AI. Regarding telemedicine, the carbon footprint of the virtual consultations ranged between 0·005 and 3 kgCO2e, while the in-person healthcare clinic visits ranged between 0·57 and 178 kgCO2e depending on the mode of transport used, the difference in the carbon footprint being 79-99%. Although the transparency of carbon footprint analyses was often low, system boundaries were often different, and the evidence for digitalization decreasing or increasing climate impacts was limited.
CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the need for future research on these topics and that leadership and setting strategic goals in particular were missing in the literature. Our scoping review also presents a framework for digitalization-related topics and means for advancing a lower carbon footprint in healthcare.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This project has received funding from the European Union–NextGenerationEU instrument and is funded by the Research Council of Finland (RCF) under grant numbers 352891, 352892, 352893, 352986, and 353026. One author also reports funding from the Sigrid Jusélius Foundation and the Vyborg Tuberculosis Foundation.