A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Seca Regulatory Impact Assessment: Administrative Burden Costs in the Baltic Sea Region
Tekijät: Olaniyi EO, Prause G
Kustantaja: DE GRUYTER POLAND SP ZOO
Julkaisuvuosi: 2019
Lehti: Transport and Telecommunication Journal
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: TRANSPORT AND TELECOMMUNICATION JOURNAL
Lehden akronyymi: TRANSP TELECOMMUN J
Vuosikerta: 20
Numero: 1
Aloitussivu: 62
Lopetussivu: 73
Sivujen määrä: 12
ISSN: 1407-6160
eISSN: 1407-6179
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2019-0006
Tiivistelmä
After three years of 0.1% Sulphur limit of the Sulphur Emission Control Area (SECA) enforcement, empirical results have shown that the fears that SECA regulation would be a disadvantage for the Baltic Sea maritime sector are unfounded. Results have also shown commendable compliance rate and improved environmental conditions for the BSR. Nonetheless, there is still a need to clear the air regarding the costs information obligations that are required from maritime actors regarding their compliance activities. These activities are arguably obviously needful but could also lead to an unintended increase of costs of regulations.Using a BSR-wide survey and case studies, the paper identified SECA information obligations related to the shipowners from shipping line whose vessels ply the SECA waters. The authors further evaluated the costs of the administrative burden related to these tasks.The results show that the administrative burden for SECA regulations is different for shipowners and maritime authorities.
After three years of 0.1% Sulphur limit of the Sulphur Emission Control Area (SECA) enforcement, empirical results have shown that the fears that SECA regulation would be a disadvantage for the Baltic Sea maritime sector are unfounded. Results have also shown commendable compliance rate and improved environmental conditions for the BSR. Nonetheless, there is still a need to clear the air regarding the costs information obligations that are required from maritime actors regarding their compliance activities. These activities are arguably obviously needful but could also lead to an unintended increase of costs of regulations.Using a BSR-wide survey and case studies, the paper identified SECA information obligations related to the shipowners from shipping line whose vessels ply the SECA waters. The authors further evaluated the costs of the administrative burden related to these tasks.The results show that the administrative burden for SECA regulations is different for shipowners and maritime authorities.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali