A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Spectrum of creative agencies in AI-based art: analysis of art reviews




TekijätLoivaranta, Tikli; Hautala, Johanna; Lundman, Riina

KustantajaInforma UK Limited

KustannuspaikkaABINGDON

Julkaisuvuosi2025

JournalDigital Creativity

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiDigital Creativity

Lehden akronyymiDIGIT CREAT

Sivujen määrä15

ISSN1462-6268

eISSN1744-3806

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2025.2491471

Verkko-osoitehttps://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2025.2491471

Rinnakkaistallenteen osoitehttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/491826165


Tiivistelmä
The relation between creativity and AI is an ongoing debate in artmaking. AI challenges the traditional understanding of who (or what) can be the creative agent and whether the outcomes are creative. Such a debate is visible in art reviews of AI-based art, but their analyses are missing from the research on AI and creativity. We analyse 39 AI art evaluations from key global newspapers to answer the following questions: how is creative agency discussed, and how are the evaluations of creative outcomes affected by the understandings of creative agency? Our results demonstrate a spectrum of creative agencies, which expands from four (human-centred, AI-centred, co-agency, assemblage) to seven (AI-assisted, AI-enchanted, and AI-improvised) agencies. Perceived creative agency is connected to the evaluation of artworks: Positive evaluations often consider human creative agency, but negative evaluations blame AI. These findings suggest that new ways to assess creativity are emerging in the AI era.

Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This work was supported by Koneen Säätiö [20192784]; Academy of Finland [315078].


Last updated on 2025-14-05 at 12:57