The Relationship Between SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Titers and Avidity in Plasma Collected From Convalescent Nonvaccinated and Vaccinated Blood Donors




AuthorsNurmi V, Knight C, Estcourt L, Hepojoki J, Lamikanra AA, Tsang HP, Roberts DJ, Polack FP, Simmonds P, Hedman K, Alvarez-Paggi D, Harvala H

Publication year2023

JournalJournal of Infectious Diseases

Journal name in sourceThe Journal of infectious diseases

Journal acronymJ Infect Dis

Volume228

Issue3

First page 245

Last page250

ISSN0022-1899

eISSN1537-6613

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiad070


Abstract
Convalescent plasma (CP) treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has shown significant therapeutic effect when administered early (eg, Argentinian trial showing reduced hospitalization) but has in general been ineffective (eg, REMAP-CAP trial without improvement during hospitalization). To investigate whether the differences in CP used could explain the different outcomes, we compared neutralizing antibodies, anti-spike IgG, and avidity of CP used in the REMAP-CAP and Argentinian trials and in convalescent vaccinees. We found no difference between the trial plasmas, emphasizing initial patient serostatus as treatment efficacy predictor. By contrast, vaccinee CP showed significantly higher titers and avidity, being preferable for future CP treatment. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02735707 and NCT04479163.



Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:15