A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

PCI in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation




TekijätLønborg, Jacob; Jabbari, Reza; Sabbah, Muhammad; Veien, Karsten T; Niemelä, Matti; Freeman, Phillip; Linder, Rickard; Ioanes, Dan; Terkelsen, Christian J; Kajander, Olli A; Koul, Sasha; Savontaus, Mikko; Karjalainen, Pasi; Erglis, Andrejs; Minkkinen, Mikko; Sørensen, Rikke; Tilsted, Hans-Henrik; Holmvang, Lene; Bieliauskas, Gintautas; Ellert, Julia; Piuhola, Jarkko; Eftekhari, Ashkan; Angerås, Oskar; Rück, Andreas; Christiansen, Evald H; Jørgensen, Troels; Özbek, Burcu T; Glinge, Charlotte; Søndergaard, Lars; De Backer, Ole; Engstrøm, Thomas; NOTION-3 Study Group

KustantajaMassachusetts Medical Society

Julkaisuvuosi2024

Lehti: New England Journal of Medicine

Vuosikerta391

Numero23

Aloitussivu2189

Lopetussivu2200

ISSN0028-4793

eISSN1533-4406

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2401513

Julkaisun avoimuus kirjaamishetkelläEi avoimesti saatavilla

Julkaisukanavan avoimuus Osittain avoin julkaisukanava


Tiivistelmä
BackgroundThe benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with stable coronary artery disease and severe aortic stenosis who are undergoing transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear.MethodsIn an international trial, we randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and at least one coronary-artery stenosis with a fractional flow reserve of 0.80 or less or a diameter stenosis of at least 90% either to undergo PCI or to receive conservative treatment, with all patients also undergoing TAVI. The primary end point was a major adverse cardiac event, defined as a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization. Safety, including bleeding events and procedural complications, was assessed.ResultsA total of 455 patients underwent randomization: 227 to the PCI group and 228 to the conservative-treatment group. The median age of the patients was 82 years (interquartile range, 78 to 85), and the median Society of Thoracic Surgeons–Procedural Risk of Mortality score (on a scale from 0 to 100%, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of death within 30 days after the procedure) was 3% (interquartile range, 2 to 4). At a median follow-up of 2 years (interquartile range, 1 to 4), a major adverse cardiac event (primary end point) had occurred in 60 patients (26%) in the PCI group and in 81 (36%) in the conservative-treatment group (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.99; P=0.04). A bleeding event occurred in 64 patients (28%) in the PCI group and in 45 (20%) in the conservative-treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.22). In the PCI group, 7 patients (3%) had PCI procedure–related complications.ConclusionsAmong patients with coronary artery disease who were undergoing TAVI, PCI was associated with a lower risk of a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularization at a median follow-up of 2 years than conservative treatment. (Funded by Boston Scientific and the Danish Heart Foundation; NOTION-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03058627.)


Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
Funded by Boston Scientific and the Danish Heart Foundation; NOTION-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03058627.


Last updated on