A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Front of neck airway in Finnish helicopter emergency medical services




TekijätLjungqvist, Harry; Tommila, Miretta; Setälä, Piritta; Raatiniemi, Lasse; Pulkkinen, Ilkka; Toivonen, Pamela; Nurmi, Jouni

KustantajaElsevier

Julkaisuvuosi2024

JournalInjury

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiInjury

Artikkelin numero111689

Vuosikerta55

Numero8

ISSN0020-1383

eISSN1879-0267

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111689


Tiivistelmä

Introduction: An emergent front of neck airway (FONA) is needed when a 'can't intubate, can't oxygenate' crisis occurs. A FONA may also in specific cases be the primary choice of airway management. Two techniques exist for FONA, with literature favouring the surgical technique over the percutaneous. The reported need for a prehospital FONA is fortunately rare as the mortality has been shown to be high. Due to the low incidence, literature on FONA is limited with regards to different settings, techniques and operators. As a foundation for future research and improvement of patient care, we aim to describe the frequency, indications, technique, success, and outcomes of FONA in the Finnish helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS).

Materials and methods: This retrospective descriptive study reviews FONA performed at the Finnish HEMS during 1.1.2012 to 8.9.2019. The Finnish HEMS consists of six units, staffed mainly by anaesthesiologists. Clinical data was gathered from a national HEMS database and trough chart reviews. Data on mortality was obtained from a population registry. Only descriptive statistics were performed.

Results: A total of 22 FONA were performed during the study period, 7 were primary and 14 performed after failure to intubate (missing data regarding indication for one attempt). This equals a 0.13 % (14/10,813) need for a rescue FONA and a rate of 0.20 % (22/10,813) FONA out of all advanced airway management. All but one FONA was performed using a surgical approach (20/21, 95 %, missing data = 1) and all were successful (22/22, 100 %). Indications were mainly cardiac arrest (10/22, 45 %) and trauma (6/22, 27 %), and the most common reason for a need for a secondary FONA was obstruction of airway by food or fluids (7/14, 50 %). On-scene mortality was 36 % (8/22) and 30-day mortality 90 % (19/21, missing data = 1).

Conclusion: The need for FONA is scarce in a HEMS system with experienced airway providers. Even though the procedure is successfully performed, the mortality is markedly high.


Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot
This study was supported by Helsinki University Hospital (state funding VTR TYH2022320).


Last updated on 2025-27-01 at 19:49