A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
A Dynamic Model of Embeddedness in Digital Infrastructures
Tekijät: Daniel Fürstenau, Abayomi Baiyere, Natalia Kliewer
Kustantaja: INFORMS
Julkaisuvuosi: 2019
Journal: Information Systems Research
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Lehden akronyymi: INFORM SYST RES
Vuosikerta: 30
Numero: 4
Aloitussivu: 1319
Lopetussivu: 1342
Sivujen määrä: 24
ISSN: 1047-7047
eISSN: 1526-5536
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2019.0864
Tiivistelmä
Digital infrastructures are a result of individual yet interdependent systems evolving in relation to each other. In this paper, we identify three processes by which individual systems become embedded into digital infrastructures. First, there are parallel processes, in which systems become embedded independently of each other. Second, there are competitive processes, in which the embeddedness of one system increases at the expense of another. Finally, there are spanning processes, in which bridges are built between different embedded systems. The three processes, synthesized into a dynamic model of digital infrastructure embeddedness, offer much-needed conceptual clarity to the area of digital infrastructure evolution. They also provide insight into the emergence of three forms of digital infrastructures: silofied, regenerated, and unified. Reflecting an interconnection view, our research further facilitates an understanding of infrastructure inertia and its associated consequence.
Digital infrastructures are a result of individual yet interdependent systems evolving in relation to each other. In this paper, we identify three processes by which individual systems become embedded into digital infrastructures. First, there are parallel processes, in which systems become embedded independently of each other. Second, there are competitive processes, in which the embeddedness of one system increases at the expense of another. Finally, there are spanning processes, in which bridges are built between different embedded systems. The three processes, synthesized into a dynamic model of digital infrastructure embeddedness, offer much-needed conceptual clarity to the area of digital infrastructure evolution. They also provide insight into the emergence of three forms of digital infrastructures: silofied, regenerated, and unified. Reflecting an interconnection view, our research further facilitates an understanding of infrastructure inertia and its associated consequence.