A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Upper Airway Collapsibility during Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Healthy Volunteers: A Nonblinded Randomized Crossover Study




AuthorsÅse Lodenius, Kathleen Maddison, Brad Lawther, Mika Scheinin, Lars Eriksson, Peter Eastwood, David Hillman, Malin Fagerlund, Jennifer Walsh

PublisherNLM (Medline)

Publication year2019

JournalAnesthesiology

Journal name in sourceAnesthesiology

Volume131

Issue5

First page 962

Last page973

Number of pages12

ISSN1528-1175

eISSN1528-1175

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002883


Abstract

Background: Dexmedetomidine is a sedative promoted as having minimal

impact on ventilatory drive or upper airway muscle activity. However, a trial

recently demonstrated impaired ventilatory drive and induction of apneas in

sedated volunteers. The present study measured upper airway collapsibility

during dexmedetomidine sedation and related it to propofol.

Methods: Twelve volunteers (seven female) entered this nonblinded, randomized 

crossover study. Upper airway collapsibility (pharyngeal critical pressure) 

was measured during low and moderate infusion rates of propofol or

dexmedetomidine. A bolus dose was followed by low (0.5 μg · kg−1 · h−1 or 42

μg · kg−1 · min−1) and moderate (1.5 μg · kg−1 · h−1 or 83 μg · kg−1 · min−1)

rates of infusion of dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively.

Results: Complete data sets were obtained from nine volunteers (median

age [range], 46 [23 to 66] yr; body mass index, 25.4 [20.3 to 32.4] kg/

m2). The Bispectral Index score at time of pharyngeal critical pressure

measurements was 74 ± 10 and 65 ± 13 (mean difference, 9; 95% CI, 3 to 16;

P = 0.011) during low infusion rates versus 57 ± 16 and 39 ± 12 (mean

difference, 18; 95% CI, 8 to 28; P = 0.003) during moderate infusion rates of

dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively. A difference in pharyngeal critical 

pressure during sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol could not be

shown at either the low or moderate infusion rate. Median (interquartile range)

pharyngeal critical pressure was −2.0 (less than −15 to 2.3) and 0.9 (less

than −15 to 1.5) cm H2O (mean difference, 0.9; 95% CI, −4.7 to 3.1) during

low infusion rates (P = 0. 595) versus 0.3 (−9.2 to 1.4) and −0.6 (−7.7 to

1.3) cm H2O (mean difference, 0.0; 95% CI, −2.1 to 2.1; P = 0.980) during

moderate infusion of dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively. A strong

linear relationship between pharyngeal critical pressure during dexmedetomidine 

and propofol sedation was evident at low (r = 0.82; P = 0.007) and

moderate (r = 0.90; P < 0.001) infusion rates.

Conclusions: These observations suggest that dexmedetomidine sedation

does not inherently protect against upper airway obstruction. 



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 14:29