A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Upper Airway Collapsibility during Dexmedetomidine and Propofol Sedation in Healthy Volunteers: A Nonblinded Randomized Crossover Study
Authors: Åse Lodenius, Kathleen Maddison, Brad Lawther, Mika Scheinin, Lars Eriksson, Peter Eastwood, David Hillman, Malin Fagerlund, Jennifer Walsh
Publisher: NLM (Medline)
Publication year: 2019
Journal: Anesthesiology
Journal name in source: Anesthesiology
Volume: 131
Issue: 5
First page : 962
Last page: 973
Number of pages: 12
ISSN: 1528-1175
eISSN: 1528-1175
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002883
Background: Dexmedetomidine is a sedative promoted as having minimal
impact on ventilatory drive or upper airway muscle activity. However, a trial
recently demonstrated impaired ventilatory drive and induction of apneas in
sedated volunteers. The present study measured upper airway collapsibility
during dexmedetomidine sedation and related it to propofol.
Methods: Twelve volunteers (seven female) entered this nonblinded, randomized
crossover study. Upper airway collapsibility (pharyngeal critical pressure)
was measured during low and moderate infusion rates of propofol or
dexmedetomidine. A bolus dose was followed by low (0.5 μg · kg−1 · h−1 or 42
μg · kg−1 · min−1) and moderate (1.5 μg · kg−1 · h−1 or 83 μg · kg−1 · min−1)
rates of infusion of dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively.
Results: Complete data sets were obtained from nine volunteers (median
age [range], 46 [23 to 66] yr; body mass index, 25.4 [20.3 to 32.4] kg/
m2). The Bispectral Index score at time of pharyngeal critical pressure
measurements was 74 ± 10 and 65 ± 13 (mean difference, 9; 95% CI, 3 to 16;
P = 0.011) during low infusion rates versus 57 ± 16 and 39 ± 12 (mean
difference, 18; 95% CI, 8 to 28; P = 0.003) during moderate infusion rates of
dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively. A difference in pharyngeal critical
pressure during sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol could not be
shown at either the low or moderate infusion rate. Median (interquartile range)
pharyngeal critical pressure was −2.0 (less than −15 to 2.3) and 0.9 (less
than −15 to 1.5) cm H2O (mean difference, 0.9; 95% CI, −4.7 to 3.1) during
low infusion rates (P = 0. 595) versus 0.3 (−9.2 to 1.4) and −0.6 (−7.7 to
1.3) cm H2O (mean difference, 0.0; 95% CI, −2.1 to 2.1; P = 0.980) during
moderate infusion of dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively. A strong
linear relationship between pharyngeal critical pressure during dexmedetomidine
and propofol sedation was evident at low (r = 0.82; P = 0.007) and
moderate (r = 0.90; P < 0.001) infusion rates.
Conclusions: These observations suggest that dexmedetomidine sedation
does not inherently protect against upper airway obstruction.