Refereed journal article or data article (A1)
A Novel Measure of Moral Boundaries: Testing Perceived In-Group/Out-Group Value Differences in a Midwestern Sample
List of Authors: Rengin Firat, Hye Won Kwon, Steven Hitlin
Publisher: Sage Publications, Inc.
Publication year: 2018
Journal: Socius
Volume number: 4
Start page: 111
End page: 11
eISSN: 2378-0231
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2378023118818741
URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2378023118818741
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/43723276
The literature on group differences and social identities has long assumed that value judgments about groups constitute a basic form of social categorization. However, little research has empirically investigated how values unite or divide social groups. The authors seek to address this gap by developing a novel measure of group values: third-order beliefs about in- and out-group members, building on Schwartz value theory. The authors demonstrate that their new measure is a promising empirical tool for quantifying previously abstract social boundaries. Results from a midwestern sample show an important dichotomy such that in-groups were attributed the more positive and altruistic transcendence and openness values, while out-groups were associated conservation and enhancement, the value domains revolving around a self-focus and social restraint. Furthermore, religious attendance and political ideology also emerged as strong predictors of value boundaries, whereas socioeconomic indicators were less influential. Significance and implications are discussed.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |