A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Safety of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter–defibrillator implantation during uninterrupted warfarin treatment – The FinPAC study
Alaotsikko: The FinPAC study
Tekijät: Airaksinen KEJ, Korkeila P, Lund J, Ylitalo A, Karjalainen P, Virtanen V, Raatikainen P, Koivisto UM, Koistinen J
Julkaisuvuosi: 2013
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology
Numero sarjassa: 4
Vuosikerta: 168
Numero: 4
Aloitussivu: 3679
Lopetussivu: 3682
Sivujen määrä: 4
ISSN: 0167-5273
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.06.022
Tiivistelmä
Background: Periprocedural management of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients undergoing cardiac rhythm management (CRM) device implantation is controversial. Prior studies demonstrate that uninterrupted OAC may be safe, but limited data from randomized trials exist.
Methods: Weconducted a multicenter, randomized trial to evaluate the safety of uninterrupted OAC during CRM device implantation. Patients on long-term warfarin (N = 213) treatment with contemporary indication for CRM device implantation were randomized to uninterrupted versus interrupted (2 days) OAC therapy. The primary outcome included major bleeding events necessitating additional intervention and thromboembolic events during 4 weeks follow-up.
Results: The randomized groups were well matched in terms of bleeding and thromboembolic risk. Only one (1%) patient in the uninterrupted OAC group (N = 106) needed blood transfusion due to rupture of proximal cephalic vein. Large hematomas were detected in 6% of patients in both groups, but there was no need for pocket revision in either group. Any pocket hematoma was observed in 35 patients (33%) in the uninterrupted OAC group and in 43 patients (40%) with interrupted OAC and uninterrupted OAC strategy was non-inferior to interrupted OAC (HR 0.86, 95%, p = 0.001 for non-inferiority). One patient with interrupted OAC had stroke 3 days after the procedure. Hospital stay was comparable in all patient groups.
Conclusion: Our randomized study demonstrates that CRM devices can be safely implanted without discontinuation of warfarin treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Background: Periprocedural management of oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients undergoing cardiac rhythm management (CRM) device implantation is controversial. Prior studies demonstrate that uninterrupted OAC may be safe, but limited data from randomized trials exist.
Methods: Weconducted a multicenter, randomized trial to evaluate the safety of uninterrupted OAC during CRM device implantation. Patients on long-term warfarin (N = 213) treatment with contemporary indication for CRM device implantation were randomized to uninterrupted versus interrupted (2 days) OAC therapy. The primary outcome included major bleeding events necessitating additional intervention and thromboembolic events during 4 weeks follow-up.
Results: The randomized groups were well matched in terms of bleeding and thromboembolic risk. Only one (1%) patient in the uninterrupted OAC group (N = 106) needed blood transfusion due to rupture of proximal cephalic vein. Large hematomas were detected in 6% of patients in both groups, but there was no need for pocket revision in either group. Any pocket hematoma was observed in 35 patients (33%) in the uninterrupted OAC group and in 43 patients (40%) with interrupted OAC and uninterrupted OAC strategy was non-inferior to interrupted OAC (HR 0.86, 95%, p = 0.001 for non-inferiority). One patient with interrupted OAC had stroke 3 days after the procedure. Hospital stay was comparable in all patient groups.
Conclusion: Our randomized study demonstrates that CRM devices can be safely implanted without discontinuation of warfarin treatment. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali