A2 Vertaisarvioitu katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Reconstructive Surgery of Inguinal Defects: A Systematic Literature Review of Surgical Etiology and Reconstructive Technique




TekijätSörelius K, Schiraldi L, Giordano S, Oranges CM, Raffoul W, DI Summa PG.

Julkaisuvuosi2019

JournalIn Vivo

Lehden akronyymiIn Vivo

Vuosikerta33

Numero1

Aloitussivu1

Lopetussivu9

Sivujen määrä9

ISSN0258-851X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.11431


Tiivistelmä
AbstractBACKGROUND/AIM:

This study aimed to evaluate the literature regarding surgical etiology demanding inguinal reconstructive surgery, associated reconstructive techniques and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA statement between 1996-2016.

RESULTS:

A total of 64 articles were included, comprising 816 patients. Two main subgroups of patients were identified: Oncological resections (n=255, 31%), and vascular surgery (n=538, 66%). Oncological resection inguinal defects were treated with pedicled myocutaneous flaps (n=166, 65%), fasciocutaneous flaps (77, 31%), muscle flaps (7, 3%) and direct closure (3, 1%). Vascular surgery complications were treated with muscle flaps (n=513, 95%). Complications for the respective subgroup (oncological resections, vascular surgery) were: infection (24%, 14%), seroma (34%, 7.5%), flap dehiscence/delayed healing (20.6%, 40.8%,). The total reintervention rate was 20%.

CONCLUSION:

Reconstruction of inguinal defects should be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Myocutaneous flaps were favoured after oncological resections, while muscle flaps were preferred after vascular surgery.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:10