A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Change agents’ cognitive maps of circular supply chain transition : An investigation of barriers, actions, and outcomes
Tekijät: Nyffenegger, Roger A.; Zehendner, Axel; Quarshie, Anne M.; Leuschner, Rudolf
Kustantaja: Elsevier
Julkaisuvuosi: 2024
Journal: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Artikkelin numero: 100906
Vuosikerta: 30
Numero: 4
ISSN: 1478-4092
eISSN: 1873-6505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100906
Verkko-osoite: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2024.100906
Rinnakkaistallenteen osoite: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/387227843
Integrating circular principles into supply chains (SCs) is a significant challenge for many managers aiming to decouple their organizations’ activities from the use of natural resources and environmental degradation. Despite increasing research focusing on the circular economy (CE), little attention has been given to individuals’ interpretations of the circular transition and their own transition strategies. This interpretivist qualitative study provides insights into the managerial sensemaking of the circular SC transition, including the barriers faced and the strategic actions taken to overcome the barriers and realize desired outcomes. Semi-structured interviews with 19 change agents were combined with a cognitive mapping approach. The individual cognitive structures were synthesized into an overarching sensemaking map that captured the informants’ perceptions and social construction of the circular SC transition. The findings reveal four shared cognitive frames (i.e., the most plausible schemes) held by change agents: (1) SC cooperation, (2) circular business models, (3) circular design, and (4) material choice. Moreover, we develop a framework that highlights how sensemaking contributes to the calibration of cognitive frames and the strategies pursued by individuals. We contribute to the literature by providing insights into change agents’ social construction and perceptions of the circular SC transition and propose key takeaways for practitioners and policymakers.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
Julkaisussa olevat rahoitustiedot:
This article is based on Roger Nyffenegger's Master's thesis, which he submitted to the University of St. Gallen (HSG). Roger Nyffenegger would like to thank his supervisors for their support.Anne Quarshie is thankful for funding provided by the Academy of Finland (Profi6/BIODIFORM/Biodiversity and systemic transformation) and the Strategic Research Council (BIODIFUL/Biodiversity Respectful Leadership, project number 345880).
