Autoinflammation Around AES Total Ankle Replacement Implants




Koivu H, Takakubo Y, Mackiewicz Z, Al-Samadi A, Soininen A, Peled N, Kukis M, Trokovic N, Konttinen YT

PublisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC

2015

Foot and Ankle International

FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL

FOOT ANKLE INT

36

12

1455

1462

8

1071-1007

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1071100715596608(external)



Background: Failure of total ankle replacement (TAR) can be characterized by early peri-implant osteolysis even in the presence of very modest numbers of wear particles. The hypothesis of the study was that this reaction is in part mediated by autoinflammatory responses mediated via damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs, danger signals) and pattern-recognizing danger signal receptors (PRRs). Methods: Peri-implant tissue and control samples from 10 patients with AES implants were immunostained for hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha), activated caspase-3, high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), receptor for advanced glycation end product (RAGE), and toll-like receptors TLR2 and TLR4. Results were evaluated on a 0 to 4 scale (from 0% to > 50% stained area). Results: Peri-implant tissue around failed TAR implants had a relatively high mean HIF-1a score of 3 on a scale, which however was similar in control samples. HMGB1 (a DAMP) was seen to be mobilized from nuclei to cellular cytoplasm, and the active caspase-3+ cells were increased. All PRRs were increased in revision samples. Conclusions: Increased expression of HMGB1 and other danger signals together with increased PRR-dependent responsiveness could contribute to autoinflammatory peri-implantitis, multilocular cyst formation, and osteolysis in failed TAR implants. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.




Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:31