A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
From technocracy to participation? Positivist, realist and pragmatist paradigms applied to traffic and environmental policy futures research in Finland
Authors: Tapio Petri
Publisher: Elsevier (Commercial Publisher)
Publication year: 1996
Journal: Futures
Journal name in source: FUTURES
Journal acronym: FUTURES
Volume: 28
Issue: 5
First page : 453
Last page: 470
Number of pages: 18
ISSN: 0016-3287
eISSN: 1873-6378
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-3287(96)00019-5
Abstract
This article continues the discussion of futures research categories. Nine questions are addressed concerning futures research methods, the use of the methods and the role of futures research in planning and decision-making processes from an environmental policy point of view. On the basis of the nine questions, three paradigms are outlined-positivism, realism and pragmatism. They form a gradient from technocracy to citizen participation. Three traffic futures research cases in Finland are analysed. The cases represent mostly the positivist paradigm although the method in case two has traces of realism and even pragmatism. Environmental problems are considered matters of uncertainty, not substantial arguments. It is concluded that the choice of a futures research method is less important than the use of the method. But of most crucial relevance is the role of futures research in the whole planning and decision-making process. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
This article continues the discussion of futures research categories. Nine questions are addressed concerning futures research methods, the use of the methods and the role of futures research in planning and decision-making processes from an environmental policy point of view. On the basis of the nine questions, three paradigms are outlined-positivism, realism and pragmatism. They form a gradient from technocracy to citizen participation. Three traffic futures research cases in Finland are analysed. The cases represent mostly the positivist paradigm although the method in case two has traces of realism and even pragmatism. Environmental problems are considered matters of uncertainty, not substantial arguments. It is concluded that the choice of a futures research method is less important than the use of the method. But of most crucial relevance is the role of futures research in the whole planning and decision-making process. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
UTU Research Portal