A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Why Probability Has Not Succeeded in Sociology




AuthorsErola J

PublisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD

Publication year2010

JournalSociology

Journal name in sourceSOCIOLOGY-THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION

Journal acronymSOCIOLOGY

Number in series1

Volume44

Issue1

First page 121

Last page138

Number of pages18

ISSN0038-0385

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1177/0038038509351626


Abstract
Arguably, sociologists often apply deterministic explanations, unlike in many other sciences where probabilistic explanations have turned out to be more efficient. The advantages of applying probabilistic explanations more frequently could be: improved possibilities for cross-disciplinary work; the simplification of successful explanations; an easier way to implement uncertainty to models; new ways to utilize the classical theories of sociology; and increased freedom to choose research methods. According to the previously published literature, one of the reasons for not applying probabilistic explanations has been the strong positivist heritage in sociology. The following additional factors are considered: important classics of sociology were written before probability theories matured; and qualitative methods have provided the possibility to respond to the need for empirical research. In this way, sociologists have avoided the extensive work of re-evaluating the existing theories from a probabilistic point of view.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 16:06