A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Pulse wave reflection in currently and previously preeclamptic women
Tekijät: Rönnback M, Lampinen K, Groop PH, Kaaja R
Julkaisuvuosi: 2005
Journal: Hypertension in Pregnancy
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Hypertension in pregnancy
Lehden akronyymi: Hypertens Pregnancy
Vuosikerta: 24
Numero: 2
Aloitussivu: 171
Lopetussivu: 80
Sivujen määrä: 10
ISSN: 1064-1955
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/PRG-200059871
Tiivistelmä
Disturbed maternal endothelial function is believed to be central in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and has been observed to persist for several years following the preeclamptic pregnancy. Endothelial dysfunction has been reported to cause increased pulse wave reflection, a measure of systemic arterial stiffness. This study tested the hypothesis that preeclampsia and a history of preeclampsia are associated with increased pulse wave reflection.\nWe carried out a cross-sectional case-control study of 26 pregnant women with preeclampsia, 26 pregnant controls, 22 normotensive nonpregnant previously preeclamptic women, and 22 nonpregnant controls. Pulse wave reflection was assessed by applanation tonometry on the radial artery.\nPregnant preeclamptic women had a significantly higher heart rate-adjusted augmentation index than did pregnant controls (23 +/- 1 vs. 8 +/- 1%, P < 0.001). The augmentation index of women with a history of preeclampsia was similar to that of the nonpregnant controls (9 +/- 2 vs. 9 +/- 2%, P = 0.78). In a multiple linear regression analysis (R2 = 0.76) the augmentation index of pregnant women was independently associated with a diagnosis of preeclampsia (P < 0.001) and heart rate (P < 0.001), but not with mean arterial blood pressure (P = 0.59).\nThis study demonstrates that pulse wave reflection and, thus, systemic arterial stiffness are increased in pregnant women with preeclampsia, but not in normotensive nonpregnant women with a history of preeclampsia. The results support the concept of generalized vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia.\nOBJECTIVE\nDESIGN AND METHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSIONS
Disturbed maternal endothelial function is believed to be central in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia and has been observed to persist for several years following the preeclamptic pregnancy. Endothelial dysfunction has been reported to cause increased pulse wave reflection, a measure of systemic arterial stiffness. This study tested the hypothesis that preeclampsia and a history of preeclampsia are associated with increased pulse wave reflection.\nWe carried out a cross-sectional case-control study of 26 pregnant women with preeclampsia, 26 pregnant controls, 22 normotensive nonpregnant previously preeclamptic women, and 22 nonpregnant controls. Pulse wave reflection was assessed by applanation tonometry on the radial artery.\nPregnant preeclamptic women had a significantly higher heart rate-adjusted augmentation index than did pregnant controls (23 +/- 1 vs. 8 +/- 1%, P < 0.001). The augmentation index of women with a history of preeclampsia was similar to that of the nonpregnant controls (9 +/- 2 vs. 9 +/- 2%, P = 0.78). In a multiple linear regression analysis (R2 = 0.76) the augmentation index of pregnant women was independently associated with a diagnosis of preeclampsia (P < 0.001) and heart rate (P < 0.001), but not with mean arterial blood pressure (P = 0.59).\nThis study demonstrates that pulse wave reflection and, thus, systemic arterial stiffness are increased in pregnant women with preeclampsia, but not in normotensive nonpregnant women with a history of preeclampsia. The results support the concept of generalized vascular dysfunction in preeclampsia.\nOBJECTIVE\nDESIGN AND METHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSIONS
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali