A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Differential effects of selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) tamoxifen, ospemifene and raloxifene on human osteoclasts in vitro
Authors: Michael H, Härkönen PL, Kangas L, Väänänen HK, Hentunen TA
Publication year: 2007
Journal: British Journal of Pharmacology
Journal name in source: British journal of pharmacology
Journal acronym: Br J Pharmacol
Volume: 151
Issue: 3
First page : 384
Last page: 95
Number of pages: 12
ISSN: 0007-1188
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0707232
Abstract
Several selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) with oestrogen agonist effects in bone cells and without increased risk of breast and endometrial cancer have been developed. Here, we have investigated the effects of different types of SERMs on osteoclast differentiation, bone resorption and apoptosis in vitro.\nHuman peripheral blood-derived CD14+ monocytes were cultured on bovine bone slices in the presence of RANKL, M-CSF, TNF-alpha and dexamethasone for seven days. Also, CD14+ monocytes were co-cultured either with human SaOS-2 or MG-63 osteosarcoma cells, in the presence of parathyroid hormone. Osteoclast cultures were treated with different SERMs. TRACP+ multinucleated cells and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were used as markers for osteoclast formation and bone resorption, respectively.\nIn CD14+ monocyte cultures, tamoxifen directly inhibited human osteoclast formation and bone resorption, while raloxifene and ospemifene had no inhibitory effect. In the co-cultures either with SaOS-2 or MG-63 cells, ospemifene and raloxifene as well as tamoxifen inhibited osteoclast formation in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect was associated with an increased production of osteoprotegerin. The anti-oestrogen ICI 182 780 completely reversed the effects of these SERMs.\nTamoxifen had an oestrogen receptor dependent, direct, inhibitory effect on human osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption, whereas ospemifene and raloxifene required osteoblastic cells to achieve a similar inhibition. The effects of ospemifene and raloxifene were mediated by oestrogen receptors by a mechanism involving paracrine induction of osteoprotegerin in cultures with osteoblast derived osteosarcoma cells.\nBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\nEXPERIMENTAL APPROACH\nKEY RESULTS\nCONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS
Several selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) with oestrogen agonist effects in bone cells and without increased risk of breast and endometrial cancer have been developed. Here, we have investigated the effects of different types of SERMs on osteoclast differentiation, bone resorption and apoptosis in vitro.\nHuman peripheral blood-derived CD14+ monocytes were cultured on bovine bone slices in the presence of RANKL, M-CSF, TNF-alpha and dexamethasone for seven days. Also, CD14+ monocytes were co-cultured either with human SaOS-2 or MG-63 osteosarcoma cells, in the presence of parathyroid hormone. Osteoclast cultures were treated with different SERMs. TRACP+ multinucleated cells and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen were used as markers for osteoclast formation and bone resorption, respectively.\nIn CD14+ monocyte cultures, tamoxifen directly inhibited human osteoclast formation and bone resorption, while raloxifene and ospemifene had no inhibitory effect. In the co-cultures either with SaOS-2 or MG-63 cells, ospemifene and raloxifene as well as tamoxifen inhibited osteoclast formation in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect was associated with an increased production of osteoprotegerin. The anti-oestrogen ICI 182 780 completely reversed the effects of these SERMs.\nTamoxifen had an oestrogen receptor dependent, direct, inhibitory effect on human osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption, whereas ospemifene and raloxifene required osteoblastic cells to achieve a similar inhibition. The effects of ospemifene and raloxifene were mediated by oestrogen receptors by a mechanism involving paracrine induction of osteoprotegerin in cultures with osteoblast derived osteosarcoma cells.\nBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\nEXPERIMENTAL APPROACH\nKEY RESULTS\nCONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS