A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Applicability of SWOT analysis for measuring quality of public oral health services as perceived by adult patients in Finland Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats
Tekijät: Toivanen T, Lahti S, Leino-Kilpi H
Julkaisuvuosi: 1999
Journal: Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Lehden akronyymi: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
Vuosikerta: 27
Numero: 5
Aloitussivu: 386
Lopetussivu: 91
Sivujen määrä: 6
ISSN: 0301-5661
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb02035.x
Tiivistelmä
To determine the applicability of SWOT analysis for measuring the quality of public oral health services from the adult client's perspective.\nData were collected using a structured questionnaire developed in an earlier study. The study group consisted of all adult (over 18 years of age) clients (n = 256) using public municipal oral health services in Kirkkonummi, Finland, during 2 weeks in 1995. Before treatment, patients filled out a questionnaire that measured the importance of their expectations in different aspects of oral care. After the appointment, they filled out a similar questionnaire that measured the enactment of these expectations in the treatment situation. The response rate was 51%. The difference between subjective importance and enactment of expectations was tested by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Results were interpreted using both a conventional analysis of "expectation enacted or not" and SWOT analysis, which is used in strategic planning to identify areas of strengths (S), weaknesses (W), opportunities (O) and threats (T) in an organisation.\nIn 28 statements out of 35, the two analyses revealed similar interpretations. In most areas the patient-perceived quality of the services was good. Weaknesses were found in the following areas: communicating to patients the causes and risk of developing oral diseases, informing them about different treatment possibilities, and including patients in decision-making when choosing restorative materials.\nSWOT analysis provided more structured interpretation of the results, and can be more easily transferred to development of services.\nOBJECTIVE\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSION
To determine the applicability of SWOT analysis for measuring the quality of public oral health services from the adult client's perspective.\nData were collected using a structured questionnaire developed in an earlier study. The study group consisted of all adult (over 18 years of age) clients (n = 256) using public municipal oral health services in Kirkkonummi, Finland, during 2 weeks in 1995. Before treatment, patients filled out a questionnaire that measured the importance of their expectations in different aspects of oral care. After the appointment, they filled out a similar questionnaire that measured the enactment of these expectations in the treatment situation. The response rate was 51%. The difference between subjective importance and enactment of expectations was tested by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Results were interpreted using both a conventional analysis of "expectation enacted or not" and SWOT analysis, which is used in strategic planning to identify areas of strengths (S), weaknesses (W), opportunities (O) and threats (T) in an organisation.\nIn 28 statements out of 35, the two analyses revealed similar interpretations. In most areas the patient-perceived quality of the services was good. Weaknesses were found in the following areas: communicating to patients the causes and risk of developing oral diseases, informing them about different treatment possibilities, and including patients in decision-making when choosing restorative materials.\nSWOT analysis provided more structured interpretation of the results, and can be more easily transferred to development of services.\nOBJECTIVE\nMETHODS\nRESULTS\nCONCLUSION
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali