A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Changes in caregiver burden and health-related quality of life of informal caregivers of older people with Dementia – Evidence from the European RightTimePlaceCare prospective cohort study
Alaotsikko: Evidence from the European RightTimePlaceCare prospective cohort study
Tekijät: Michel HC Bleijlevens, Minna Stolt, Astrid Stephan, Adelaida Zabalegui, Kai Saks, Caroline Sutcliffe, Connie Lethin, Maria E Soto, Sandra MG Zwakhalen
Kustantaja: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Julkaisuvuosi: 2015
Journal: Journal of Advanced Nursing
Vuosikerta: 71
Numero: 6
Aloitussivu: 1378
Lopetussivu: 1391
Sivujen määrä: 14
ISSN: 0309-2402
eISSN: 1365-2648
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12561
Aims
To describe differences in caregiver burden and health-related quality of life of informal caregivers of people with dementia in eight European countries and assess changes after transition from home to institutional long-term care.
Background
Country differences in the experience of burden and health-related quality of life are rarely described.
Design
Prospective cohort study.
Methods
Data on burden and health-related quality of life were collected at baseline (conducted between November 2010–April 2012) and follow-up (after 3 months) using face-to-face interviews. Two groups of informal caregivers included those: (1) of people with dementia recently admitted to institutional long-term care facilities; and those (2) of people with dementia receiving home care. Statistical analyses focused on descriptive comparisons between groups and countries.
Results
Informal caregivers of about 2014 were interviewed. Informal caregivers of people with dementia at home experienced more burden compared with informal caregivers of recently institutionalised people with dementia. Almost no differences in health-related quality of life were found between groups. Large differences between countries on outcomes were found. Informal caregivers of people with dementia who made the transition to an institutional long-term care facility experienced a statistically significant decrease in burden and psychological distress at follow-up.
Conclusion
Cross-country differences may be related to differences in health and social care systems. Taking this into account, informal caregiver interventions need to be tailored to (country specific) contexts and (individual) needs. Findings highlight the positive impact of admission to institutional long-term care on informal caregiver well-being.