A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Validation of a new HPV self-sampling device for cervical cancer screening: The Cervical and Self-Sample In Screening (CASSIS) study
Authors: Mariam El-Zein, Sheila Bouten, Karolina Louvanto, Lucy Gilbert, Walter Gotlieb, Robert Hemmings, Marcel A. Behr, Eduardo L. Franco
Publisher: ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
Publication year: 2018
Journal: Gynecologic Oncology
Journal name in source: GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
Journal acronym: GYNECOL ONCOL
Volume: 149
Issue: 3
First page : 491
Last page: 497
Number of pages: 7
ISSN: 0090-8258
eISSN: 1095-6859
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.004
Abstract
Objective. We compared the self-sampling performance of the newly designed HerSwab (TM) device with a physician-collected cervical sample and another self-sample using the cobas (R) PCR Female swab for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer.Methods. Women referred for colposcopy at McGill University affiliated hospital clinics collected two consecutive self-samples, one with HerSwab (TM) and one with cobas (R) swab, after receiving instructions. The order of sampling was randomized. The colposcopist then collected a cervical sample and conducted a colposcopic examination. Samples were tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. Sensitivity and specificity to detect CIN2+ and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare sampling approaches. The HPV testing agreement between samples was measured using the Kappa statistic.Results. Of 1217 women enrolled, 1076 had complete results for HPV and cytology; 148 (13.8%) had CIN1, 147 (13.7%) had CIN2/3, and 5 (0.5%) had cancer. There was very good agreement between methods for HPV detection (HerSwab (TM) versus physician: kappa = 0.84; cobas (R) swabs versus physician: kappa = 0.81; HerSwab (TM) versus cobas (R) swabs: kappa = 0.87). The sensitivity of HPV detection for CIN2+ was 87.6% (95%CI: 79.8-93.2) with self-sampling using HerSwab (TM), 88.6% (95%CI: 80.9-94.0) with self-sampling using the cobas (R) swab, and 92.4% (95%CI: 85.5-96.7) with physician sampling. Corresponding estimates of specificity were 58.1% (95%CI: 54.1-62.1), 55.0% (95%CI: 50.9-59.0) and 58.7% (95%CI: 54.6-62.6). Cytology (ASC-US or more severe) done on the physician-collected specimen was 80.2% (95%CI: 70.8-87.6) sensitive and 61.4% (95%CI: 57.2-65.5) specific for CIN2+.Conclusions. The HerSwab (TM) had good agreement with physician sampling in detecting HPV, and adequate performance in detecting high-grade lesions among women referred to colposcopy for abnormal cytology. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Objective. We compared the self-sampling performance of the newly designed HerSwab (TM) device with a physician-collected cervical sample and another self-sample using the cobas (R) PCR Female swab for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cancer.Methods. Women referred for colposcopy at McGill University affiliated hospital clinics collected two consecutive self-samples, one with HerSwab (TM) and one with cobas (R) swab, after receiving instructions. The order of sampling was randomized. The colposcopist then collected a cervical sample and conducted a colposcopic examination. Samples were tested for human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA. Sensitivity and specificity to detect CIN2+ and respective 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to compare sampling approaches. The HPV testing agreement between samples was measured using the Kappa statistic.Results. Of 1217 women enrolled, 1076 had complete results for HPV and cytology; 148 (13.8%) had CIN1, 147 (13.7%) had CIN2/3, and 5 (0.5%) had cancer. There was very good agreement between methods for HPV detection (HerSwab (TM) versus physician: kappa = 0.84; cobas (R) swabs versus physician: kappa = 0.81; HerSwab (TM) versus cobas (R) swabs: kappa = 0.87). The sensitivity of HPV detection for CIN2+ was 87.6% (95%CI: 79.8-93.2) with self-sampling using HerSwab (TM), 88.6% (95%CI: 80.9-94.0) with self-sampling using the cobas (R) swab, and 92.4% (95%CI: 85.5-96.7) with physician sampling. Corresponding estimates of specificity were 58.1% (95%CI: 54.1-62.1), 55.0% (95%CI: 50.9-59.0) and 58.7% (95%CI: 54.6-62.6). Cytology (ASC-US or more severe) done on the physician-collected specimen was 80.2% (95%CI: 70.8-87.6) sensitive and 61.4% (95%CI: 57.2-65.5) specific for CIN2+.Conclusions. The HerSwab (TM) had good agreement with physician sampling in detecting HPV, and adequate performance in detecting high-grade lesions among women referred to colposcopy for abnormal cytology. (C) 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
UTU Research Portal