A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

One-cm Versus 2-cm Excision Margins for Patients With Intermediate Thickness Melanoma: A Matched-Pair Analysis




AuthorsKoskivuo I, Giordano S, Verajankorva E, Vihinen P

PublisherLIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS

Publication year2015

JournalDermatologic Surgery

Journal name in sourceDERMATOLOGIC SURGERY

Journal acronymDERMATOL SURG

Volume41

Issue10

First page 1130

Last page1136

Number of pages7

ISSN1076-0512

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000465(external)


Abstract

BACKGROUNDOptimum excision margins used in the removal of intermediate thickness melanomas remain unclear.OBJECTIVEThis study's aim was to compare the clinical outcomes of 1-cm margins with 2-cm margins in patients with a tumor thickness of 1.1- to 4.0-mm.MATERIALS AND METHODSThis was a retrospective study, which was based on a matched-pairs design. Equal patient cohorts were constructed in terms of gender, age, Breslow thickness, and the anatomic location of the primary lesion. There were 80 patients whom underwent an excision with a 1-cm margin and 80 patients with a 2-cm margin. Follow-up data were analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox regression model.RESULTSAfter a median follow-up time of 41 months, there were no differences in relapse-free survival or melanoma-specific survival between study groups. The wound was closed directly in 62 patients (78%) in the 1-cm group and in 36 patients (45%) in the 2-cm group (p < .001).CONCLUSIONA 1-cm excision margin may be sufficient in melanomas of 1.1 to 2.0 mm in Breslow thickness based on these findings of low recurrence. With thicker tumors (2.1-4.0 mm), this recommendation cannot be given due to inherent study limitations.




Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:35