The excuse principle can maintain cooperation through forgivable defection in the Prisoner's Dilemma game




Indrikis Krams, Hanna Kokko, Jolanta Vrublevska, Mikus Āboliņš-Ābols, Tatjana Krama, Markus J Rantala

2013

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Proceedings. Biological sciences / The Royal Society

1766

280

1766

20131475

2

0962-8452

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.1475



Reciprocal altruism describes a situation in which an organism acts in a manner that temporarily reduces its fitness while increasing another organism's fitness, but there is an ultimate fitness benefit based on an expectation that the other organism will act in a similar manner at a later time. It creates the obvious dilemma in which there is always a short-term benefit to cheating, therefore cooperating individuals must avoid being exploited by non-cooperating cheaters. This is achieved by following various decision rules, usually variants of the tit-for-tat (TFT) strategy. The strength of TFT, however, is also its weakness-mistakes in implementation or interpretation of moves, or the inability to cooperate, lead to a permanent breakdown in cooperation. We show that pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca) use a TFT with an embedded 'excuse principle' to forgive the neighbours that were perceived as unable to cooperate during mobbing of predators. The excuse principle dramatically increases the stability of TFT-like behavioural strategies within the Prisoner's Dilemma game.




Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 16:32