A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
PREDATION AND INTERSPECIFIC COMPETITION IN 2 MICROTUS VOLES
Authors: NORRDAHL K, KORPIMAKI E
Publisher: MUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
Publication year: 1993
Journal: Oikos
Journal name in source: OIKOS
Journal acronym: OIKOS
Volume: 67
Issue: 1
First page : 149
Last page: 158
Number of pages: 10
ISSN: 0030-1299
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3545105
Abstract
We studied predation and interspecific competition in two Microtus species (M. agrestis and M. epiroticus) using long term trapping and data on predator diet in western Finland. In the study area, Microtus densities fluctuated from ten to 100-fold and predator densities fluctuated more than ten-fold.M. epiroticus suffered more from predation than M. agrestis, probably because densities in M. epiroticus patches were higher than densities in M. agrestis patches making M. epiroticus more profitable prey for patch-searching predators. The proportion of M. epiroticus among all voles declined during the crash phase of the vole cycle, at least partly as a result of predation.Breeding female voles showed little spatial overlap and presumably competed for space at high densities. At low densities, interference competition through predators may have been more important than space competition. The proportion of the smaller species M. epiroticus in the total number of all voles increased rapidly with increasing vole densities. This could be due to more aggregated way of life which gives an advantage in competition for space. Predation reduced the time for space competition to short periods, and decreased periodically the proportion of the more successful competitor. Thus, the coexistence of the two vole species seemed to be predator-induced. In this sense predation was a more important factor.than interspecific competition.
We studied predation and interspecific competition in two Microtus species (M. agrestis and M. epiroticus) using long term trapping and data on predator diet in western Finland. In the study area, Microtus densities fluctuated from ten to 100-fold and predator densities fluctuated more than ten-fold.M. epiroticus suffered more from predation than M. agrestis, probably because densities in M. epiroticus patches were higher than densities in M. agrestis patches making M. epiroticus more profitable prey for patch-searching predators. The proportion of M. epiroticus among all voles declined during the crash phase of the vole cycle, at least partly as a result of predation.Breeding female voles showed little spatial overlap and presumably competed for space at high densities. At low densities, interference competition through predators may have been more important than space competition. The proportion of the smaller species M. epiroticus in the total number of all voles increased rapidly with increasing vole densities. This could be due to more aggregated way of life which gives an advantage in competition for space. Predation reduced the time for space competition to short periods, and decreased periodically the proportion of the more successful competitor. Thus, the coexistence of the two vole species seemed to be predator-induced. In this sense predation was a more important factor.than interspecific competition.
UTU Research Portal