A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Workload balancing in printed circuit board assembly




AuthorsEmet S, Knuutila T, Alhoniemi E, Maier M, Johnsson M, Nevalainen OS

PublisherSPRINGER LONDON LTD

Publication year2010

JournalInternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Journal name in sourceINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY

Journal acronymINT J ADV MANUF TECH

Number in series9-12

Volume50

Issue9-12

First page 1175

Last page1182

Number of pages8

ISSN0268-3768

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2558-x


Abstract
Line balancing of a printed circuit board (PCB) assembly line is considered in the present paper. The production line consists of a number of machines for inserting electronic components on bare PCBs. The aim is to distribute the assembly operations of a single PCB type to the different machines in such a way that the throughput (i.e., the number of finished PCBs per time unit) of the line is maximized. We suppose that the total time for placements is a linear function of the number of component insertions performed by a machine. Effective mathematical formulations of the balancing problem are then available but previous models omit several aspects having an effect on the actual placement times. In particular, we extend an existing MILP formulation of the problem to consider the usage of feeder modules, precedence constraints among the placement operations, and duplication of frequently used components in several machines. We consider production lines consisting of several gantry-type placement machines. Unlike previous research, we applied standard optimization tools for solving the balancing problems. We then observed that the CPLEX-software was able to solve MILP formulations of 2- and 3-machine problems with up to 150 different component types and relatively large number of component placements (from 400 to 6,000). On the other hand, the running time was rather unstable so that heuristics are still needed for cases where exact methods fail.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 22:13