A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer: effect of b-value distribution on repeatability and cancer characterization




TekijätMerisaari H, Toivonen J, Pesola M, Taimen P, Boström PJ, Pahikkala T, Aronen HJ, Jambor I

KustantajaElsevier

Julkaisuvuosi2015

JournalMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Vuosikerta33

Numero10

Aloitussivu1212

Lopetussivu1218

Sivujen määrä7

ISSN0730-725X

eISSN0730-725X

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2015.07.004


Tiivistelmä

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of b-value distribution on the repeatability and Gleason score (GS) prediction of prostate cancer (PCa).



METHODS: Fifty PCa patients underwent two repeated 3T diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) examinations using 12 b values in the range from 0 to 2000s/mm(2) and diffusion time of 20.3ms. Mean signal intensities of regions of interest, placed in PCa using whole mount prostatectomy sections as the reference, were fitted using monoexponential, kurtosis, stretched exponential, and biexponential models. In total, 4083 different b-value combinations consisting of 2 to 12 b values were evaluated. Repeatability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient,
ICC(3,1), and coefficient of repeatability (CoR). Areas under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) for PCa characterization were estimated while the correlation of the fitted values with GS groups (3+3, 3+4, >3+4) was evaluated by using the Spearman correlation coefficient (ρ).
RESULTS: The parameters of monoexponential, kurtosis, and stretched exponential models estimated using only 4-5, 5-7, 5-7 b values, respectively, had similar ICC(3,1), CoR, AUC, and ρ values as the parameters estimated using all 12 b values. Optimized b-value distributions demonstrated improved ICC(3,1) and CoR values but failed to improve AUC and ρ values. The parameters of biexponential model demonstrated the worst repeatability and diagnostic performance.
CONCLUSION: B-value distribution influences mainly the repeatability of
DWI-derived parameters rather than the diagnostic performance.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:26