Workplace Physical Activity Interventions: A Systematic Review




To QG, Chen TTL, Magnussen CG, To KG

PublisherAMER JOURNAL HEALTH PROMOTION INC

TROY; PO BOX 1254, TROY, MI 48099-1254 USA

2013

American Journal of Health Promotion

American Journal of Health Promotion

Am.J.Health Promot.

6

27

6

E113

E123

11

0890-1171

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.4278/ajhp.120425-LIT-222(external)



Objective. To assess the effectiveness of workplace interventions in improving physical activity. Data Source. EBSCO research database (and all subdatabases). Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria. Articles were published from 2000 to 2010 in English, had appropriate designs, and measured employees' physical activity, energy consumption, and/or body mass index (BMI) as primary outcomes. Articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded. Data Extraction. Data extracted included study design, study population, duration, intervention activities, outcomes, and results. Data Synthesis. Data were synthesized into one table. Results of each relevant outcome including p values were combined. Results. Twelve (60%) of 20 selected interventions reported an improvement in physical activity level, steps, or BMI, and there was one slowed step reduction in the intervention group. Among these, 10 were less than 6 months in duration; 9 used pedometers; 6 applied Internet-based approaches; and 5 included activities targeting social and environmental levels. Seven of 8 interventions with pre-posttest and quasi-experimental controlled design showed improvement on at least one outcome. However, 7 of 12 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) did not prove effective in any outcome. Conclusion. Interventions that had less rigorous research designs, used pedometers, applied Internet-based approaches, and included activities at social and environmental levels were more likely to report being effective than those without these characteristics.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:40