A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Survival in Very Preterm Infants: An International Comparison of 10 National Neonatal Networks




TekijätKjell Helenius, Gunnar Sjörs, Prakesh S. Shah, Neena Modi, Brian Reichman, Naho Morisaki, Satoshi Kusuda, Kei Lui, Brian A. Darlow, Dirk Bassler, Stellan Håkansson, Mark Adams, Maximo Vento, Franca Rusconi, Tetsuya Isayama, Shoo K. Lee, Liisa Lehtonen; on behalf of the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes (iNeo) of Neonates

Julkaisuvuosi2018

JournalPediatrics

Artikkelin numeroe20171264

Vuosikerta140

Numero6

Sivujen määrä3

ISSN0029-7828

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-1264


Tiivistelmä
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare survival rates and age at death among very preterm infants in 10 national and regional neonatal networks.

METHODS: A cohort study of very preterm infants, born between 24 and 29 weeks’ gestation and weighing <1500 g, admitted to participating neonatal units between 2007 and 2013 in the International Network for Evaluating Outcomes of Neonates. Survival was compared by using standardized ratios (SRs) comparing survival in each network to the survival estimate of the whole population.

RESULTS: Network populations differed with respect to rates of cesarean birth, exposure to antenatal steroids and birth in nontertiary hospitals. Network SRs for survival were highest in Japan (SR: 1.10; 99% confidence interval: 1.08–1.13) and lowest in Spain (SR: 0.88; 99% confidence interval: 0.85–0.90). The overall survival differed from 78% to 93% among networks, the difference being highest at 24 weeks’ gestation (range 35%–84%). Survival rates increased and differences between networks diminished with increasing gestational age (GA) (range 92%–98% at 29 weeks’ gestation); yet, relative differences in survival followed a similar pattern at all GAs. The median age at death varied from 4 days to 13 days across networks.

CONCLUSIONS: The network ranking of survival rates for very preterm infants remained largely unchanged as GA increased; however, survival rates showed marked variations at lower GAs. The median age at death also varied among networks. These findings warrant further assessment of the representativeness of the study populations, organization of perinatal services, national guidelines, philosophy of care at extreme GAs, and resources used for decision-making.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:33