A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Fragmentation in International Law and Global Governance: A Conceptual Inquiry
Tekijät: Timo Pankakoski, Antto Vihma
Kustantaja: BERGHAHN JOURNALS
Julkaisuvuosi: 2017
Journal: Contributions to the History of Concepts
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HISTORY OF CONCEPTS
Lehden akronyymi: CONTRIB HIST CONCEPT
Vuosikerta: 12
Numero: 1
Aloitussivu: 22
Lopetussivu: 48
Sivujen määrä: 27
ISSN: 1807-9326
eISSN: 1874-656X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2017.120103
Tiivistelmä
This article examines the concept and metaphor of fragmentation and its underlying assumptions in international law and global governance. Aft er engaging with fragmentation historically, we analyze current debates through five conceptual perspectives. Fragmentation is oft en perceived as a process, a gradation, a process with a single direction, a prognosis, and normatively as either loss or liberation. These interlinked tendencies carry conceptual implications, such as making fragmentation apparently inevitable or provoking positive revaluations of fragmentation in terms of differentiation. Furthermore, the conceptual coupling of fragmentation with modernity enhances these effects with an historical thesis. Consequently, fragmentation appears as a ubiquitous and necessary, rather than contingent, feature of modern law-a conceptual implication that may hinder empirical work, and that merits critical analysis.
This article examines the concept and metaphor of fragmentation and its underlying assumptions in international law and global governance. Aft er engaging with fragmentation historically, we analyze current debates through five conceptual perspectives. Fragmentation is oft en perceived as a process, a gradation, a process with a single direction, a prognosis, and normatively as either loss or liberation. These interlinked tendencies carry conceptual implications, such as making fragmentation apparently inevitable or provoking positive revaluations of fragmentation in terms of differentiation. Furthermore, the conceptual coupling of fragmentation with modernity enhances these effects with an historical thesis. Consequently, fragmentation appears as a ubiquitous and necessary, rather than contingent, feature of modern law-a conceptual implication that may hinder empirical work, and that merits critical analysis.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali