A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Recombinant factor VIIa use in acute type A aortic dissection repair: A multicenter propensity-score-matched report from the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection




AuthorsIgor Zindovic, Johan Sjögren, Anders Ahlsson, Henrik Bjursten, Simon Fuglsang, Arnar Geirsson, Richard Ingemansson, Emma C. Hansson, Ari Mennander, Christian Olsson, Emily Pan, Susann Ullén, Tomas Gudbjartsson, Shahab Nozohoor

PublisherMosby Inc.

Publication year2017

JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Journal name in sourceJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volume154

Issue6

First page 1852

Last page1859

Number of pages10

ISSN0022-5223

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.08.020


Abstract

Background: Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is often
complicated by excessive bleeding. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) effectively
treats refractory bleeding associated with ATAAD surgery; however, adverse
effects of rFVIIa in these patients have not been fully assessed. Here we evaluated
rFVIIa treatment in ATAAD surgery using the Nordic Consortium for Acute Type
A Aortic Dissection (NORCAAD) database.
Methods: This was a multicenter, propensity score–matched, retrospective study.
Information about rFVIIa use was available for 761 patients, of whom 171 were
treated with rFVIIa. We successfully matched 120 patients treated with rFVIIa
with 120 controls. Primary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, postoperative
stroke, and renal replacement therapy (RRT). Survival data were presented using
Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Results: Compared with controls, patients treated with rFVIIa receivedmore transfusions
of packed red blood cells (median, 9.0 U [4.0-17.0 U] vs 5.0 U [2.0-11.0 U];
P ¼ .008), platelets (4.0 U [2.0-8.0 U] vs 2.0 U [1.0-4.4 U]; P<.001), and fresh
frozen plasma (8.0 U [4.0-18.0 U] vs 5.5 U [2.0-10.3 U]; P ¼ .01) underwent
reexploration for bleedingmore often (31.0%vs 16.8%; P¼.014); and had greater
24-hour chest tube output (1500 L [835-2500 mL] vs 990 mL [520-1720 mL]).
Treatment with rFVIIa was not associated with significantly increased rates of
in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI],
0.34-1.55; P ¼ .487), postoperative stroke (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 0.82-3.91;
P ¼ .163), or RRT (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.48-2.92; P ¼ .839).
Conclusions: In this propensity-matched cohort study of patients undergoing
ATAAD surgery, treatment with rFVIIa for major bleeding was not
associated with a significantly increased risk of stroke, RRT, or mortality. (J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;154:1852-9)



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 20:28