A3 Vertaisarvioitu kirjan tai muun kokoomateoksen osa

Reason vs. rationality: From rankings to tournaments in individual choice




TekijätJanusz Kacprzyk, Hannu Nurmi, Slawomir Zadrozny

ToimittajaN.T. Ngyen, R. Kowalczyk, J. Mercik

Painos1

Julkaisuvuosi2017

Kokoomateoksen nimiTransactions in Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII

Sarjan nimiTransaction in Computational Collective Intelligence

Numero sarjassaXXVII

Vuosikerta10480

Aloitussivu28

Lopetussivu39

ISBN978-3-319-70646-7

eISBN978-3-319-70647-4

ISSN2190-9288

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4


Tiivistelmä
The standard assumption in decision theory, microeconomics and social choice is that individuals (consumers, voters) are endowed with preferences that can be expressed as complete and transitive binary relations
over alternatives (bundles of goods, policies, candidates). While this may often be the case, we show by way of toy examples that incomplete and intransitive preference relations are not only conceivable, but
make intuitive sense. We then suggest that fuzzy preference relations and solution concepts based on them are plausible in accommodating those features that give rise to intransitive and incomplete preferences.
Tracing the history of those solutions leads to the works of Zermelo in 1920's.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 23:23