A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Specific and Cross-reactive Plasmablast Response in Humans after Primary and Secondary Immunization with Vi Capsular Polysaccharide Typhoid Vaccine
Tekijät: Pakkanen SH, Kantele JM, Rombo L, Kantele A
Kustantaja: WILEY
Julkaisuvuosi: 2017
Journal: Scandinavian Journal of Immunology
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
Lehden akronyymi: SCAND J IMMUNOL
Vuosikerta: 86
Numero: 4
Aloitussivu: 207
Lopetussivu: 215
Sivujen määrä: 9
ISSN: 0300-9475
eISSN: 1365-3083
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sji.12583
Tiivistelmä
Secondary immunization with polysaccharide vaccines may imply a risk of hyporesponsiveness. Despite the wide use of typhoid Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine, its potential tendency to hyporesponsiveness has been inadequately addressed. While previous studies have explored serum antibody responses, we applied a more sensitive approach, a single-cell assay for circulating plasmablasts, to compare primary and secondary responses. Twelve subjects received primary and booster doses of the Vi vaccine (Typherix (R)) at 30-to 37-month intervals. Plasmablasts specific to the Vi or typhoidal O antigens or cross-reactive with paratyphoid and non-typhoidal Salmonella strains were identified as antibodysecreting cells (ASC) with ELISPOT. Before vaccinations, none had plasmablasts specific to the antigens tested. Twelve of 12 subjects showed a Vi-specific response after primary, but only eight of 12 after booster vaccination. All responded to typhoidal O-9,12 antigen after both immunizations. The geometric mean of plasmablasts specific to the Vi antigen was 59 (95% CI 24-119) and 1 (0-54) IgA + IgG + IgM-ASC/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) after primary and booster immunizations, respectively, and 20 (9-49) and 56 (29-103) to the O-9,12 antigen. We detected 1 (0-28) and 17 (6-36) ASC/10(6) PBMC cross-reactive with Salmonella Paratyphi A; 3 (0-30) and 22 (8-48) with S. Paratyphi B; 3 (0-29) and 18 (7-47) with S. Paratyphi C; 19 (10-34) and 51 (26-94) with Salmonella Enteritidis; and 1 (0-35) and 23 (9-52) with Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively. One-third of the vaccinees, although responding to the O-9,12 antigen, failed to respond to the Vi antigen after booster immunization, suggesting hyporesponsiveness in part of the vaccinees. The findings warrant further investigation.
Secondary immunization with polysaccharide vaccines may imply a risk of hyporesponsiveness. Despite the wide use of typhoid Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine, its potential tendency to hyporesponsiveness has been inadequately addressed. While previous studies have explored serum antibody responses, we applied a more sensitive approach, a single-cell assay for circulating plasmablasts, to compare primary and secondary responses. Twelve subjects received primary and booster doses of the Vi vaccine (Typherix (R)) at 30-to 37-month intervals. Plasmablasts specific to the Vi or typhoidal O antigens or cross-reactive with paratyphoid and non-typhoidal Salmonella strains were identified as antibodysecreting cells (ASC) with ELISPOT. Before vaccinations, none had plasmablasts specific to the antigens tested. Twelve of 12 subjects showed a Vi-specific response after primary, but only eight of 12 after booster vaccination. All responded to typhoidal O-9,12 antigen after both immunizations. The geometric mean of plasmablasts specific to the Vi antigen was 59 (95% CI 24-119) and 1 (0-54) IgA + IgG + IgM-ASC/10(6) peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) after primary and booster immunizations, respectively, and 20 (9-49) and 56 (29-103) to the O-9,12 antigen. We detected 1 (0-28) and 17 (6-36) ASC/10(6) PBMC cross-reactive with Salmonella Paratyphi A; 3 (0-30) and 22 (8-48) with S. Paratyphi B; 3 (0-29) and 18 (7-47) with S. Paratyphi C; 19 (10-34) and 51 (26-94) with Salmonella Enteritidis; and 1 (0-35) and 23 (9-52) with Salmonella Typhimurium, respectively. One-third of the vaccinees, although responding to the O-9,12 antigen, failed to respond to the Vi antigen after booster immunization, suggesting hyporesponsiveness in part of the vaccinees. The findings warrant further investigation.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali