A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
No premature closures of debates, please: A response to Ahrens
Tekijät: Marja-Liisa Kakkuri-Knuuttila, Kari Lukka, Jaakko Kuorikoski
Kustantaja: PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2008
Journal: Accounting, Organizations and Society
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY
Lehden akronyymi: ACCOUNT ORG SOC
Vuosikerta: 33
Numero: 2-3
Aloitussivu: 298
Lopetussivu: 301
Sivujen määrä: 4
ISSN: 0361-3682
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.001
Tiivistelmä
In this response to Ahrens [Ahrens, T. (2008). Overcoming the subjective-objective divide in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 292-297] we clarify both the motivation and the core points of the Kakkuri-Knuuttila et al. [Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L., Lukka, K., & Kuorikoski, J. (2008). Straddling between paradigms: A naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 267-291] paper. We remind the management accounting academia that we should be careful not to close prematurely examinations and debates on issues, which are not yet truly resolved.
In this response to Ahrens [Ahrens, T. (2008). Overcoming the subjective-objective divide in interpretive management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 292-297] we clarify both the motivation and the core points of the Kakkuri-Knuuttila et al. [Kakkuri-Knuuttila, M.-L., Lukka, K., & Kuorikoski, J. (2008). Straddling between paradigms: A naturalistic philosophical case study on interpretive research in management accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(2-3), 267-291] paper. We remind the management accounting academia that we should be careful not to close prematurely examinations and debates on issues, which are not yet truly resolved.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali