A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Are periprosthetic osteolytic lesions in ankle worth bone grafting?




TekijätKohonen I, Koivu H, Tiusanen H, Kankare J, Vahlberg T, Mattila K

KustantajaELSEVIER SCIENCE BV

Julkaisuvuosi2017

JournalFoot and Ankle Surgery

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiFOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY

Lehden akronyymiFOOT ANKLE SURG

Vuosikerta23

Numero2

Aloitussivu128

Lopetussivu133

Sivujen määrä6

ISSN1268-7731

eISSN1460-9584

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.01.010


Tiivistelmä
Background: We retrospectively evaluated the medium-term follow-up of bone grafting due to periprosthetic osteolytic lesions in ankles.Methods: 34 ankles (32 patients) with total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) underwent re operation. Indications were large periprosthetic osteolytic lesions or continuous growing of the lesions. The osteolytic lesions were imaged by CT before reoperation and once a year after that. The mean CT follow-up after re operation was 3.8 years (range, 2-6.2 years). Patient's clinical outcome was also monitored.Results: Osteolysis continued to progress in 44 bone grafted lesions (68%) in CT follow-up. Pain (p = 0.04) and location of the lesion (p = 0.03) were associated with progression of osteolysis. In 18 bone grafted osteolytic lesions (28%) the radiological survival remained excellent. 25 out of 34 ankles showed improvement of the function after bone grafting.Conclusions: There is no established treatment protocol for osteolysis around TAA. Bone grafting is one alternative in the treatment of osteolytic lesions. (C) 2017 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 15:43