A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Exploring effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in a pig model of hypothermic circulatory arrest
Tekijät: Herajarvi J, Anttila T, Dimova EY, Laukka T, Myllymaki M, Haapanen H, Olenchock BA, Tuominen H, Puistola U, Karihtala P, Kiviluoma K, Koivunen P, Anttila V, Juvonen T
Kustantaja: TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Julkaisuvuosi: 2017
Lehti:: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: SCANDINAVIAN CARDIOVASCULAR JOURNAL
Lehden akronyymi: SCAND CARDIOVASC J
Vuosikerta: 51
Numero: 4
Aloitussivu: 233
Lopetussivu: 241
Sivujen määrä: 9
ISSN: 1401-7431
eISSN: 1651-2006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2017.1319574
Tiivistelmä
Objectives. During aortic and cardiac surgery, risks for mortality and morbidity are inevitable. Surgical setups involving deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) are effective to achieve organ protection against ischemic injury. The aim of this study was to identify humoural factors mediating additive protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in a porcine model of DHCA. Design. Twenty-two pigs were randomized into the RIPC group (n=11) and the control group (n=11). The RIPC group underwent four 5-minute hind limb ischemia-reperfusion cycles prior to cardiopulmonary bypass and DHCA. All animals underwent identical surgical procedures including 60min DHCA at 18 degrees C. Blood samples were collected from vena cava and sagittal sinus at several time points. After the 8-hour follow-up period, the brain, heart, and kidney tissue samples were collected for tissue analyses. Results. Serum levels of brain damage marker S100B recovered faster in the RIPC group, after 4hours of the arrest, (p<.05). Systemic lactate levels were lower and cardiac index was higher in the RIPC group postoperatively. Immunohistochemical cerebellum regional scores of antioxidant response regulator Nrf2 were better in the RIPC group (mean: 1.1, IQR: 0.0-2.5) compared with the control group (mean: 0.0, IQR: 0.0-0.0), reaching borderline statistical significance (p=.064). RIPC induced detectable modulations of plasma proteome and metabolites. Conclusions. The faster recovery of S100B, lower systemic lactate levels and favourable regional antioxidant response suggest possible neuronal cellular and mitochondrial protection by RIPC, whereas better cardiac index underlines functional effects of RIPC. The exact humoural factor remains unclear.
Objectives. During aortic and cardiac surgery, risks for mortality and morbidity are inevitable. Surgical setups involving deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) are effective to achieve organ protection against ischemic injury. The aim of this study was to identify humoural factors mediating additive protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) in a porcine model of DHCA. Design. Twenty-two pigs were randomized into the RIPC group (n=11) and the control group (n=11). The RIPC group underwent four 5-minute hind limb ischemia-reperfusion cycles prior to cardiopulmonary bypass and DHCA. All animals underwent identical surgical procedures including 60min DHCA at 18 degrees C. Blood samples were collected from vena cava and sagittal sinus at several time points. After the 8-hour follow-up period, the brain, heart, and kidney tissue samples were collected for tissue analyses. Results. Serum levels of brain damage marker S100B recovered faster in the RIPC group, after 4hours of the arrest, (p<.05). Systemic lactate levels were lower and cardiac index was higher in the RIPC group postoperatively. Immunohistochemical cerebellum regional scores of antioxidant response regulator Nrf2 were better in the RIPC group (mean: 1.1, IQR: 0.0-2.5) compared with the control group (mean: 0.0, IQR: 0.0-0.0), reaching borderline statistical significance (p=.064). RIPC induced detectable modulations of plasma proteome and metabolites. Conclusions. The faster recovery of S100B, lower systemic lactate levels and favourable regional antioxidant response suggest possible neuronal cellular and mitochondrial protection by RIPC, whereas better cardiac index underlines functional effects of RIPC. The exact humoural factor remains unclear.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali