A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Stent-assisted embolization of recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms




AuthorsTahtinen OI, Manninen HI, Vanninen RL, Rautio R, Haapanen A, Seppanen J, Niskakangas T, Rinne J, Keski-Nisula L

PublisherSPRINGER

Publishing placeNEW YORK; 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, NY 10013 USA

Publication year2013

JournalNeuroradiology

Journal name in sourceNeuroradiology

Journal acronymNeuroradiology

Number in series10

Volume55

Issue10

First page 1221

Last page1231

Number of pages11

ISSN0028-3940

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-013-1234-x


Abstract
Intracranial stents have theoretical advantages in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms, but the usability of intracranial stents in the retreatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms is relatively unknown. In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stent-assisted embolization in the retreatment of recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms. Retrospective evaluation was carried out for 55 consecutive patients (17 men and 38 women; mean age 51.5 years), with 56 recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms electively retreated with stent-assisted embolization. The technical success rate was 91 % (50/55 patients). Procedural complications were encountered with six patients (11 %). Angiographic and clinical follow-up data were available for 51 patients (93 %), with a mean follow-up period of 28.1 months. No rebleedings were encountered during the study period. The clinical outcome was favorable in 50 patients (91 %), with a Glasgow Outcome Score of 4 (N = 14) or 5 (N = 36) at the end of the study period. Poor clinical outcome correlated with very large (> 2 cm) total aneurysm size (P = 0.002), large (> 10 mm) recurrent aneurysm size (P = 0.011), and occurrence of periprocedural complications (P < 0.001). Stent-assisted coil embolization is beneficial for the retreatment of wide-necked recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms, but stability and permanent occlusion of the recurrent aneurysm is unlikely if the aneurysm exceeds 2 cm in diameter, the recurrent diameter of the aneurysm exceeds 10 mm, or if mass effect is present with the recurrent aneurysm.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 11:59