A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Structural and biophysical analysis of interactions between cod and human uracil-DNA N-glycosylase (UNG) and UNG inhibitor (Ugi)
Tekijät: N. G. Assefa, L. Niiranen, K. A. Johnson, H.-K. S. Leiros, A. O. Smalås, N. P. Willassen, E. Moe
Kustantaja: WILEY-BLACKWELL
Kustannuspaikka: HOBOKEN; 111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
Julkaisuvuosi: 2014
Journal: Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: Acta Crystallographica Section D-Biological Crystallography
Lehden akronyymi: Acta Crystallogr.Sect.D-Biol.Crystallogr.
Vuosikerta: 70
Aloitussivu: 2093
Lopetussivu: 2100
Sivujen määrä: 8
ISSN: 0907-4449
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004714011699
Uracil-DNA N-glycosylase from Atlantic cod (cUNG) shows cold-adapted features such as high catalytic efficiency, a low temperature optimum for activity and reduced thermal stability compared with its mesophilic homologue human UNG (hUNG). In order to understand the role of the enzyme-substrate interaction related to the cold-adapted properties, the structure of cUNG in complex with a bacteriophage encoded natural UNG inhibitor (Ugi) has been determined. The interaction has also been analyzed by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The crystal structure of cUNG-Ugi was determined to a resolution of 1.9 angstrom with eight complexes in the asymmetric unit related through noncrystallographic symmetry. A comparison of the cUNG-Ugi complex with previously determined structures of UNG-Ugi shows that they are very similar, and confirmed the nucleotide-mimicking properties of Ugi. Biophysically, the interaction between cUNG and Ugi is very strong and shows a binding constant (K-b) which is one order of magnitude larger than that for hUNG-Ugi. The binding of both cUNG and hUNG to Ugi was shown to be favoured by both enthalpic and entropic forces; however, the binding of cUNG to Ugi is mainly dominated by enthalpy, while the entropic term is dominant for hUNG. The observed differences in the binding properties may be explained by an overall greater positive electrostatic surface potential in the protein-Ugi interface of cUNG and the slightly more hydrophobic surface of hUNG.