A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä

Variation in quality of mountain birch and tea-leaved willow for mammal and insect herbivores: Differences among trees, among sites and between tree species




TekijätSuomela J, Suominen O, Torvi M

KustantajaMUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD

Julkaisuvuosi1997

JournalEcography

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimiECOGRAPHY

Lehden akronyymiECOGRAPHY

Vuosikerta20

Numero3

Aloitussivu224

Lopetussivu232

Sivujen määrä9

ISSN0906-7590

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1997.tb00365.x


Tiivistelmä
We evaluated palatability of winter dormant tree twigs to the mountain hare Lepus timidus and the grey-sided vole Clethrionomys rufocanus with captive animals. We tested differences among trees within sites, among sites, and between two tree species (the mountain birch Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii and the tea-leaved willow Salix phylicifolia). In one of the sites, we also measured growth rates of autumnal moth Epirrita autumnata larvae on the same trees that were used in preference trials with the hares and voles. The differences in palatability to hares and voles were greatest al the level of tree species; both hares and voles preferred birches over willows, but with the hare there was some overlap in palatability between the tree species. There were also large and significant differences among sites and among trees within sites. Within sites, variation in tree palatability seemed to be larger among willows than among birches. Hares and voles may select willows at least partly on the same basis, but there was no correlation between palatability of the trees to the mammals and the growth rate of the larvae of the autumnal moth on the same trees. Variation in twig palatability to the hares and voles was so large at all levels (among trees within sites, among sites and between tree species) that we suggest it also has implications for food selection of these mammalian herbivores under natural conditions.

Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.





Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 17:05