A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal

Ergative case attrition in Central Indo-Aryan NP-splits and the Referential Hierarchy




AuthorsPhillips M

PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company

Publication year2013

JournalStudies in Language

Journal name in sourceSTUDIES IN LANGUAGE

Journal acronymSTUD LANG

Number in series1

Volume37

Issue1

First page 196

Last page216

Number of pages21

ISSN0378-4177

DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.1.05phi


Abstract
Differential case marking is often determined on the basis of inherent semantic properties associated with core arguments of the verb. This frequently results in a hierarchical split in which certain types of NPs are more or less likely to be case marked when in the role of agent/patient. The Referential Hierarchy (RH) (see Silverstein 1976; Comrie 1981) models this phenomenon in terms of the markedness of agent vs. patient roles, based on the semantic parameters of animacy/definiteness. Yet recent studies have raised doubts as to the constistency of the RH in predicting split-ergative marking (e.g. Filimonova 2005; Bickel 2008). This paper explores an Indo-Aryan dialect with an NP-split in ergative marking that appears to contradict the RH: Kherwada Wagdi. It examines the possible historical scenarios that could result in a reverse NP-split, suggesting that such historical transitions tend to follow a non-linear course and are frequently left incomplete.



Last updated on 2024-26-11 at 12:50