A1 Vertaisarvioitu alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä lehdessä
Agreement of bioelectrical impedance with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and MRI to estimate changes in body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat during a 12-month weight loss intervention
Tekijät: Pietilainen KH, Kaye S, Karmi A, Suojanen L, Rissanen A, Virtanen KA
Kustantaja: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Julkaisuvuosi: 2013
Journal: British Journal of Nutrition
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Lehden akronyymi: BRIT J NUTR
Numero sarjassa: 10
Vuosikerta: 109
Numero: 10
Aloitussivu: 1910
Lopetussivu: 1916
Sivujen määrä: 7
ISSN: 0007-1145
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007114512003698
Tiivistelmä
The aim of the present study was to analyse the agreement of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and MRI in estimating body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat during a 12-month weight loss intervention. A total of nineteen obese adults (twelve females, seven males) aged 20.2-48.6 years, mean BMI 34.6 (SE 0.6) kg/m(2), participated in the study. Body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat index were measured by BIA (Omron BF-500; Omron Medizintechnik) and compared with DXA (body fat and skeletal muscle) at baseline, 5 and 12 months, and with MRI (visceral fat) at baseline and 5 months. The subjects lost 8.9 (SE 1.8) kg (9.0 (SE 1.7)%) of body weight during the 12-month intervention. BIA, as compared to DXA, accurately assessed loss of fat (7.0 (SE 1.5) v. 7.0 (SE 1.4) kg, P=0.94) and muscle (1.0 (SE 0.2) v. 1.4 (SE 0.3) kg, P=0.18). While body fat was similar by the two methods, skeletal muscle was underestimated by 1-2 kg using BIA at each time point. Compared to MRI, BIA overestimated visceral fat, especially in males. BIA and DXA showed high correlations for kg fat, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally (r 0.91-0.99). BIA, compared with DXA and MRI, detected kg muscle and visceral fat more accurately cross-sectionally (r 0.77-0.87 and r 0.40-0.78, respectively) than their changes longitudinally (r 0.24-0.61 and r 0.46, respectively). BIA is at its best when assessing the amount or changes in fat mass. It is a useful method for measuring skeletal muscle, but limited in its ability to measure visceral fat.
The aim of the present study was to analyse the agreement of bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and MRI in estimating body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat during a 12-month weight loss intervention. A total of nineteen obese adults (twelve females, seven males) aged 20.2-48.6 years, mean BMI 34.6 (SE 0.6) kg/m(2), participated in the study. Body fat, skeletal muscle and visceral fat index were measured by BIA (Omron BF-500; Omron Medizintechnik) and compared with DXA (body fat and skeletal muscle) at baseline, 5 and 12 months, and with MRI (visceral fat) at baseline and 5 months. The subjects lost 8.9 (SE 1.8) kg (9.0 (SE 1.7)%) of body weight during the 12-month intervention. BIA, as compared to DXA, accurately assessed loss of fat (7.0 (SE 1.5) v. 7.0 (SE 1.4) kg, P=0.94) and muscle (1.0 (SE 0.2) v. 1.4 (SE 0.3) kg, P=0.18). While body fat was similar by the two methods, skeletal muscle was underestimated by 1-2 kg using BIA at each time point. Compared to MRI, BIA overestimated visceral fat, especially in males. BIA and DXA showed high correlations for kg fat, both cross-sectionally and longitudinally (r 0.91-0.99). BIA, compared with DXA and MRI, detected kg muscle and visceral fat more accurately cross-sectionally (r 0.77-0.87 and r 0.40-0.78, respectively) than their changes longitudinally (r 0.24-0.61 and r 0.46, respectively). BIA is at its best when assessing the amount or changes in fat mass. It is a useful method for measuring skeletal muscle, but limited in its ability to measure visceral fat.
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali