Refereed review article in scientific journal (A2)
Affect Across the Wake-Sleep Cycle
List of Authors: Sikka Pilleriin, Gross James J.
Publisher: SPRINGERNATURE
Publication year: 2023
Journal: Affective science
Journal name in source: AFFECTIVE SCIENCE
Journal acronym: AFFECT SCI
Number of pages: 7
ISSN: 2662-2041
eISSN: 2662-205X
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00204-2
URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-023-00204-2
Self-archived copy’s web address: https://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/180812483
Abstract
Affective scientists traditionally have focused on periods of active wakefulness when people are responding to external stimuli or engaging in specific tasks. However, we live much of our lives immersed in experiences not related to the current environment or tasks at hand-mind-wandering (or daydreaming) during wakefulness and dreaming during sleep. Despite being disconnected from the immediate environment, our brains still generate affect during such periods. Yet, research on stimulus-independent affect has remained largely separate from affective science. Here, we suggest that one key future direction for affective science will be to expand our field of view by integrating the wealth of findings from research on mind-wandering, sleep, and dreaming to provide a more comprehensive account of affect across the wake-sleep cycle. In developing our argument, we address two key issues: affect variation across the wake-sleep cycle, and the benefits of expanding the study of affect across the full wake-sleep cycle. In considering these issues, we highlight the methodological and clinical implications for affective science.
Affective scientists traditionally have focused on periods of active wakefulness when people are responding to external stimuli or engaging in specific tasks. However, we live much of our lives immersed in experiences not related to the current environment or tasks at hand-mind-wandering (or daydreaming) during wakefulness and dreaming during sleep. Despite being disconnected from the immediate environment, our brains still generate affect during such periods. Yet, research on stimulus-independent affect has remained largely separate from affective science. Here, we suggest that one key future direction for affective science will be to expand our field of view by integrating the wealth of findings from research on mind-wandering, sleep, and dreaming to provide a more comprehensive account of affect across the wake-sleep cycle. In developing our argument, we address two key issues: affect variation across the wake-sleep cycle, and the benefits of expanding the study of affect across the full wake-sleep cycle. In considering these issues, we highlight the methodological and clinical implications for affective science.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
UTU Research Portal