B1 Non-refereed article in a scientific journal
Domain theory and method theory revisited: a reply to Lowe, De Loo and Nama
Authors: Kari Lukka, Eija Vinnari
Publisher: Emerald
Publication year: 2016
Journal: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Journal name in source: ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL
Journal acronym: ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN
Volume: 29
Issue: 2
First page : 317
Last page: 322
Number of pages: 6
ISSN: 0951-3574
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2080
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to the commentary of Lowe, De Loo and Nama concerning the authors' previous article, which was published in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 27 Number 8.Design/methodology/approach - The authors address the main points of the commentary by Lowe et al.Findings - In addressing each of these issues, the authors point out a few misunderstandings included in the critique as well as make an attempt to further clarify the previous argument.Originality/value - The authors maintain that distinguishing between domain theory and method theory in accounting research will be of help to researchers in several ways.
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to the commentary of Lowe, De Loo and Nama concerning the authors' previous article, which was published in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 27 Number 8.Design/methodology/approach - The authors address the main points of the commentary by Lowe et al.Findings - In addressing each of these issues, the authors point out a few misunderstandings included in the critique as well as make an attempt to further clarify the previous argument.Originality/value - The authors maintain that distinguishing between domain theory and method theory in accounting research will be of help to researchers in several ways.
Downloadable publication This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
UTU Research Portal