Kirjoitus tai data-artikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä (B1)

Domain theory and method theory revisited: a reply to Lowe, De Loo and Nama




Julkaisun tekijät: Kari Lukka, Eija Vinnari

Kustantaja: Emerald

Julkaisuvuosi: 2016

Journal: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal

Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL

Lehden akronyymi: ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN

Volyymi: 29

Julkaisunumero: 2

Sivujen määrä: 6

ISSN: 0951-3574

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2080


Tiivistelmä
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to the commentary of Lowe, De Loo and Nama concerning the authors' previous article, which was published in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 27 Number 8.Design/methodology/approach - The authors address the main points of the commentary by Lowe et al.Findings - In addressing each of these issues, the authors point out a few misunderstandings included in the critique as well as make an attempt to further clarify the previous argument.Originality/value - The authors maintain that distinguishing between domain theory and method theory in accounting research will be of help to researchers in several ways.

Ladattava julkaisu

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2021-24-06 at 08:24