Kirjoitus tai data-artikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä (B1)
Domain theory and method theory revisited: a reply to Lowe, De Loo and Nama
Julkaisun tekijät: Kari Lukka, Eija Vinnari
Kustantaja: Emerald
Julkaisuvuosi: 2016
Journal: Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal
Tietokannassa oleva lehden nimi: ACCOUNTING AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL
Lehden akronyymi: ACCOUNT AUDIT ACCOUN
Volyymi: 29
Julkaisunumero: 2
Sivujen määrä: 6
ISSN: 0951-3574
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-06-2015-2080
Tiivistelmä
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to the commentary of Lowe, De Loo and Nama concerning the authors' previous article, which was published in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 27 Number 8.Design/methodology/approach - The authors address the main points of the commentary by Lowe et al.Findings - In addressing each of these issues, the authors point out a few misunderstandings included in the critique as well as make an attempt to further clarify the previous argument.Originality/value - The authors maintain that distinguishing between domain theory and method theory in accounting research will be of help to researchers in several ways.
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a response to the commentary of Lowe, De Loo and Nama concerning the authors' previous article, which was published in Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Volume 27 Number 8.Design/methodology/approach - The authors address the main points of the commentary by Lowe et al.Findings - In addressing each of these issues, the authors point out a few misunderstandings included in the critique as well as make an attempt to further clarify the previous argument.Originality/value - The authors maintain that distinguishing between domain theory and method theory in accounting research will be of help to researchers in several ways.
Ladattava julkaisu This is an electronic reprint of the original article. |  |
Turun yliopiston Tutkimustietojärjestelmän portaali