Refereed review article in scientific journal (A2)

Does bilingualism come with linguistic costs? A meta-analytic review of the bilingual lexical deficit

List of Authors: Bylund Emanuel, Antfolk Jan, Abrahamsson Niclas, Olstad Anne Marte Haug, Norrman Gunnar, Lehtonen Minna

Publisher: SPRINGER

Publication year: 2022

Journal: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Journal name in source: PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW

Journal acronym: PSYCHON B REV

Number of pages: 17

ISSN: 1069-9384

eISSN: 1531-5320



Self-archived copy’s web address:

A series of recent studies have shown that the once-assumed cognitive advantage of bilingualism finds little support in the evidence available to date. Surprisingly, however, the view that bilingualism incurs linguistic costs (the so-called lexical deficit) has not yet been subjected to the same degree of scrutiny, despite its centrality for our understanding of the human capacity for language. The current study implemented a comprehensive meta-analysis to address this gap. By analyzing 478 effect sizes from 130 studies on expressive vocabulary, we found that observed lexical deficits could not be attributed to bilingualism: Simultaneous bilinguals (who acquired both languages from birth) did not exhibit any lexical deficit, nor did sequential bilinguals (who acquired one language from birth and a second language after that) when tested in their mother tongue. Instead, systematic evidence for a lexical deficit was found among sequential bilinguals when tested in their second language, and more so for late than for early second language learners. This result suggests that a lexical deficit may be a phenomenon of second language acquisition rather than bilingualism per se.

Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.

Last updated on 2022-08-12 at 10:17