Refereed journal article or data article (A1)

Time-resolved fluorescence based direct two-site apoA-I immunoassays and their clinical application in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease




List of AuthorsNegi Priyanka, Heikkilä Taina, Vuorenpää Karoliina, Tuunainen Emilia, Nammas Wail, Maaniitty Teemu, Knuuti Juhani, Metso Jari, Lövgren Janita, Jauhiainen Matti, Lamminmäki Urpo, Pettersson Kim, Saraste Antti

PublisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA

Publication year2022

JournalFrontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Journal name in sourceFRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE

Journal acronymFRONT CARDIOVASC MED

Article number 912578

Volume number9

Number of pages16

ISSN2297-055X

eISSN2297-055X

DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.912578

URLhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.912578/full

Self-archived copy’s web addresshttps://research.utu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/177145138


Abstract

Objective: High-density lipoprotein (HDL) is a heterogeneous group of subpopulations differing in protein/lipid composition and in their anti-atherogenic function. There is a lack of assays that can target the functionality of HDL particles related to atherosclerosis. The objective of this study was to construct two-site apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I) assays and to evaluate their clinical performance in patients with suspected obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

Approach and results: Direct two-site apoA-I assays (named 109–121 and 110–525) were developed to identify the presence of apoA-I in the HDL of patients with CAD using apoA-I antibodies as a single-chain variable fragment fused with alkaline phosphatase. ApoA-I109−121 and apoA-I110−525 were measured in 197 patients undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and myocardial positron emission tomography perfusion imaging due to suspected obstructive CAD. Among patients not using lipid-lowering medication (LLM, n = 125), the level of apoA-I110−525 was higher in the presence than in the absence of coronary atherosclerosis [21.88 (15.89–27.44) mg/dl vs. 17.66 (13.38–24.48) mg/dl, P = 0.01)], whereas there was no difference in apoA-I109−121, HDL cholesterol, and apoA-I determined using a polyclonal apoA-I antibody. The levels of apoA-I109−121 and apoA-I110−525 were similar in the presence or absence of obstructive CAD. Among patients not using LLM, apoA-I110−525 adjusted for age and sex identified individuals with coronary atherosclerosis with a similar accuracy to traditional risk factors [area under the curve [AUC] (95% CI): 0.75(0.66–0.84) 0.71 (0.62–0.81)]. However, a combination of apoA-I110−525 with risk factors did not improve the accuracy [AUC (95% CI): 0.73 (0.64–0.82)].

Conclusion: Direct two-site apoA-I assays recognizing heterogeneity in reactivity with apoA-I could provide a potential approach to identify individuals at a risk of coronary atherosclerosis. However, their clinical value remains to be studied in larger cohorts.


Downloadable publication

This is an electronic reprint of the original article.
This reprint may differ from the original in pagination and typographic detail. Please cite the original version.




Last updated on 2023-20-11 at 07:21