A1 Refereed original research article in a scientific journal
Quantitative Tools and Simultaneous Actions Needed for Species Conservation under Climate Change – Reply to Shoo et al. (2013)
Subtitle: Reply to Shoo et al. (2013)
Authors: Marko Ahteensuu, Sami Aikio, Pedro Cardoso, Marko Hyvärinen, Maria Hällfors, Susanna Lehvävirta, Leif Schulman, Elina Vaara
Publisher: Springer
Publication year: 2015
Journal: Climatic Change
Volume: 129
Issue: 1
First page : 1
Last page: 7
Number of pages: 7
ISSN: 0165-0009
eISSN: 0165-0009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1311-0(external)
We identify four issues in the decision framework for species conservation management under climate change proposed by Shoo et al. (2013) Clim Chan 119:239–246 and suggest ways to address them. First, binary-decision flow charts require Yes/No answers, which are not appropriate in most conservation decisions. A quantitative framework is preferable and action-guidance should be obtained even when the realistic answer to some questions remains “we simply do not know”. Second, the proposed flow chart imposes an a priori order of precedence and does not explicitly allow simultaneous actions. A workable framework should enable optimal allocation between multiple kinds of conservation efforts and permit complementary actions. Third, the probability of success, co-benefit to non-target species, and cost are unlikely to have a simple, consistent relationship across taxa. These variables need to be assessed case-by-case for each conservation measure and species. Finally, the decision frame- work disregards the legal, social, and ethical aspects pertaining to decision-making.